#1
|
|||
|
|||
The old me would have checked this river
Value bet.. or just dumb bet?
Total number of players : 10 Seat 1: Seat1 ( $31 ) Seat 3: Seat3 ( $29.5 ) Seat 4: Seat4 ( $23.5 ) Seat 5: Seat5 ( $25.75 ) Seat 8: Seat8 ( $47.5 ) Seat 9: Seat9 ( $26.75 ) Seat 10: Seat10 ( $16.25 ) Seat 7: PuckNPoker ( $21 ) Seat 2: Seat2 ( $28.5 ) Seat 6: Seat6 ( $5 ) Seat10 posts small blind [$0.25]. Seat1 posts big blind [$0.5]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to PuckNPoker [ 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ] Seat2 folds. Seat3 calls [$0.5]. Seat4 folds. Seat5 calls [$0.5]. Seat6 folds. PuckNPoker calls [$0.5]. Seat8 calls [$0.5]. Seat9 calls [$0.5]. Seat10 calls [$0.25]. Seat1 checks. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ] Seat10 checks. Seat1 bets [$0.5]. Seat3 folds. Seat5 folds. PuckNPoker raises [$1]. Seat8 folds. Seat9 calls [$1]. Seat10 calls [$1]. Seat1 calls [$0.5]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ] Seat10 checks. Seat1 bets [$1]. PuckNPoker raises [$2]. Seat9 calls [$2]. Seat10 calls [$2]. Seat1 calls [$1]. ** Dealing River ** [ A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ] Seat10 checks. Seat1 checks. PuckNPoker bets [$1]. ..................to be continued |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
I scrolled down to the flop, didnt read past that, and already I thought "yes, bet the river"
I read the rest, and I agreed with me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
Why wouldnt you bet this river? Are you worried someone has a 5?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
checking this river sucks real bad IMO
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
That's not a scare card. Bet the river. The real question is: do you 3-bet it if it comes back raised? (Assume h2h)
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
Checking this river doesn't even qualify as passive play. It's just lame.
Sure you might lose to a straight, but that wont't happen at all that often. Probably there is a busted flush draw out there somewhere. If it was raised I'd probably just call it down expecting to be beat though. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
value.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
[ QUOTE ]
That's not a scare card. Bet the river. The real question is: do you 3-bet it if it comes back raised? (Assume h2h) [/ QUOTE ] I bet, it was check-raised to me. Action? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] That's not a scare card. Bet the river. The real question is: do you 3-bet it if it comes back raised? (Assume h2h) [/ QUOTE ] I bet, it was check-raised to me. Action? [/ QUOTE ] If it's seat 1 I re-raise. He's got two pair(AT). If it's seat 10 I call and cry, he's got the straight. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The old me would have checked this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] That's not a scare card. Bet the river. The real question is: do you 3-bet it if it comes back raised? (Assume h2h) [/ QUOTE ] I bet, it was check-raised to me. Action? [/ QUOTE ] If it's seat 1 I re-raise. He's got two pair(AT). If it's seat 1 I call and cry, he's got the straight. [/ QUOTE ] Impressive (at least to a noob like me). It was seat ten, he had 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
|
|