Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2004, 04:43 PM
Gomez22 Gomez22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,323
Default KQo

Ultimate Bet 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Gomez22 is CO with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, <font color="CC3333">Gomez22 raises</font>, Button folds, SB folds, BB calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls.

Flop: (8.50 SB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, <font color="CC3333">Gomez22 bets</font>, BB folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls.

Turn: (5.25 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
MP1 checks, <font color="CC3333">Gomez22 bets</font>, <font color="CC3333">MP1 raises</font>, Gomez22 calls.

River: (9.25 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, Gomez22 calls.

Final Pot: 11.25 BB
<font color="green">Main Pot: 11.25 BB, between MP1 and Gomez22.</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2004, 04:48 PM
Peter Harris Peter Harris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 113
Default Re: KQo

i hate the turn c/r. At 1/2 i have the same problem, what c/r here that i beat? not a lot, but i still pay off another 2BB to see it.

Should i be folding TPTK or an overpair to a turn c/r?

Regards,
Pete Harris

Ps that means i play it the same way, but doubt it's the right way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2004, 05:41 PM
Fiddler Fiddler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Party $1/$2
Posts: 346
Default Re: KQo

[ QUOTE ]

Ps that means i play it the same way, but doubt it's the right way.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, me too.

EDIT: Both the playing and the doubting. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2004, 05:56 PM
Piiop Piiop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 77
Default Re: KQo

Standard.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2004, 06:20 PM
wuarhg wuarhg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 372
Default Re: KQo

El Standardo! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2004, 08:16 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: KQo

Gomez,

Maybe you should focus more on recognizing and reporting reads and less on stutter-posting standard hands in a Uzi-like spray across the boards.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:30 AM
LLXC LLXC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 170
Default Re: KQo

So I shouldn't post every hand I have and all the possible board outcomes??? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2004, 01:57 AM
Gomez22 Gomez22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,323
Default Re: KQo

Chess - I've always respected your opinions, but here, I think you're missing it.... The hands I posted today were after 3-tabling a little over 800 hands on UB and ones that I looked at as questionable in one way or another...

If I didn't post any reads, then obviously I had none... or maybe I had an inkling that I wasn't sure about. A player I suspect to be a LAG, you might think of as tight-aggro. For that reason, I didn't put anything in these posts today about reads because I just wanted some responses to hands that, like I already stated.... were questionable to me and something of an idea about others' thought's about them because I have some that I may or may not post later, but it's not fair for me to do that because I already know results and outcome.

Just trying to think outside the box and get some conversation started...

'Mez
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:03 AM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 856
Default Re: KQo

[ QUOTE ]
Gomez,

Maybe you should focus more on recognizing and reporting reads and less on stutter-posting standard hands in a Uzi-like spray across the boards.

[/ QUOTE ]

And you wonder why ppl say you are sarcastic [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

If you are mean, it's funny
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:11 AM
Ritter Ritter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: KQo

Me, I only raise KQo pre-flop if I'm the first one in. I'd have limped along...don't know for sure if this is a mistake or not, but in my experience it's reduced my variance.

Flop's cool...

Honestly when multi-tabling, I make the assumption without solid PT evidence to the contrary, that the majority of my opps are incapable of a CR bluff. I'd let TPGK go in a heartbeat...you had no re-draws worth shooting for.

But again, that's just me
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.