Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2004, 11:27 AM
Roy Hobbs Roy Hobbs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 134
Default Fischman v. Brunson

This was bar none the most entertaining poker broadcast I have ever seen.

RH
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2004, 02:31 PM
Vee Quiva Vee Quiva is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 66
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

That was definitely Doyle Brunson at his finest. He made excellent reads and went old school supersystem on the table by bullying them around with his big stack.

Does anyone know how many years Doyle sat out of the WSOP in protest of all the Binion family fiascos? Norman Chad mentioned he had sat out a few and "who knows how many bracelets he would have won"?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:39 PM
-Syk- -Syk- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 106
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

[ QUOTE ]
That was definitely Doyle Brunson at his finest. He made excellent reads and went old school supersystem on the table by bullying them around with his big stack.

Does anyone know how many years Doyle sat out of the WSOP in protest of all the Binion family fiascos? Norman Chad mentioned he had sat out a few and "who knows how many bracelets he would have won"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why exactly did he stop attending the WSOP ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2004, 12:09 PM
Vee Quiva Vee Quiva is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 66
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

There was some Binion vs Behnen (sp) family dispute on who would run the casino after Benny Binion died. I could be wrong but I think Jack Binion got frozen out so he went off to Mississippi and started his own casino with a big tournament. The story was discussed in "Positively Fifth Street". I don't have a copy and I read it a couple of years ago, so my details are a little sketchy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2004, 02:41 PM
jwvdcw jwvdcw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 182
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

Already a thread about this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2004, 03:25 PM
ssomega ssomega is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

Does anyone else think that Fischman would have folded his AK to anyone elses all-in but Brunson's?

I feel that he only called that first guys bet with the intention of getting out of the hand if anyone else went all-in for a sizable amount. I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called.

Anyone agree?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2004, 03:37 PM
benfranklin benfranklin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

[ QUOTE ]
I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think Fischman over-analysed the situation, and overestimated Brunson's opinion of him. He thought that Dolly was going to great lengths to set him up because Dolly was afraid of him. I think that Brunson knew who he was, but considered him another up-and-coming very good player who had not yet proved himself to be great.

In their interviews, both Brunson and Fischman talked about how you see so many hands playing online, you learn the card part of the game much quicker. When you play against guys like Brunson and Lederer, you aren't playing cards, you are playing people. Fischman still has to learn how to play people. You don't learn that multi-tabling online.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2004, 01:26 PM
NoTalent NoTalent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think Fischman over-analysed the situation, and overestimated Brunson's opinion of him. He thought that Dolly was going to great lengths to set him up because Dolly was afraid of him. I think that Brunson knew who he was, but considered him another up-and-coming very good player who had not yet proved himself to be great.

In their interviews, both Brunson and Fischman talked about how you see so many hands playing online, you learn the card part of the game much quicker. When you play against guys like Brunson and Lederer, you aren't playing cards, you are playing people. Fischman still has to learn how to play people. You don't learn that multi-tabling online.

[/ QUOTE ]

great post. I think the people interaction is very important as well (I need more experience in that dept too!)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2004, 05:30 PM
dakine dakine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 115
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone else think that Fischman would have folded his AK to anyone elses all-in but Brunson's?

I feel that he only called that first guys bet with the intention of getting out of the hand if anyone else went all-in for a sizable amount. I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called.

Anyone agree?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2004, 08:42 PM
gergery gergery is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SF Bay Area (eastbay)
Posts: 719
Default Re: Fischman v. Brunson

Fischman had his shorts totally tangled in knots over Brunson.

It was like watching a nubile young virgin mesmerized by the old wizard
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.