|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fischman v. Brunson
This was bar none the most entertaining poker broadcast I have ever seen.
RH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
That was definitely Doyle Brunson at his finest. He made excellent reads and went old school supersystem on the table by bullying them around with his big stack.
Does anyone know how many years Doyle sat out of the WSOP in protest of all the Binion family fiascos? Norman Chad mentioned he had sat out a few and "who knows how many bracelets he would have won"? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
[ QUOTE ]
That was definitely Doyle Brunson at his finest. He made excellent reads and went old school supersystem on the table by bullying them around with his big stack. Does anyone know how many years Doyle sat out of the WSOP in protest of all the Binion family fiascos? Norman Chad mentioned he had sat out a few and "who knows how many bracelets he would have won"? [/ QUOTE ] Why exactly did he stop attending the WSOP ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
There was some Binion vs Behnen (sp) family dispute on who would run the casino after Benny Binion died. I could be wrong but I think Jack Binion got frozen out so he went off to Mississippi and started his own casino with a big tournament. The story was discussed in "Positively Fifth Street". I don't have a copy and I read it a couple of years ago, so my details are a little sketchy.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
Already a thread about this.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
Does anyone else think that Fischman would have folded his AK to anyone elses all-in but Brunson's?
I feel that he only called that first guys bet with the intention of getting out of the hand if anyone else went all-in for a sizable amount. I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called. Anyone agree? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
[ QUOTE ]
I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called. [/ QUOTE ] I think Fischman over-analysed the situation, and overestimated Brunson's opinion of him. He thought that Dolly was going to great lengths to set him up because Dolly was afraid of him. I think that Brunson knew who he was, but considered him another up-and-coming very good player who had not yet proved himself to be great. In their interviews, both Brunson and Fischman talked about how you see so many hands playing online, you learn the card part of the game much quicker. When you play against guys like Brunson and Lederer, you aren't playing cards, you are playing people. Fischman still has to learn how to play people. You don't learn that multi-tabling online. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called. [/ QUOTE ] I think Fischman over-analysed the situation, and overestimated Brunson's opinion of him. He thought that Dolly was going to great lengths to set him up because Dolly was afraid of him. I think that Brunson knew who he was, but considered him another up-and-coming very good player who had not yet proved himself to be great. In their interviews, both Brunson and Fischman talked about how you see so many hands playing online, you learn the card part of the game much quicker. When you play against guys like Brunson and Lederer, you aren't playing cards, you are playing people. Fischman still has to learn how to play people. You don't learn that multi-tabling online. [/ QUOTE ] great post. I think the people interaction is very important as well (I need more experience in that dept too!) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone else think that Fischman would have folded his AK to anyone elses all-in but Brunson's? I feel that he only called that first guys bet with the intention of getting out of the hand if anyone else went all-in for a sizable amount. I think he felt like Brunson was putting a move on him and thats the only reason why he called. Anyone agree? [/ QUOTE ] I agree! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fischman v. Brunson
Fischman had his shorts totally tangled in knots over Brunson.
It was like watching a nubile young virgin mesmerized by the old wizard |
|
|