#1
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
I don't think I would have capped the flop but if I had led the flop and it was raised I certainly would have 3 bet it. As played you took control of the betting which is always a good thing.
I would be most worried about the CO who was cold calling everything. This normally means a big draw to me. The only big draw on the flop is the straight. I'm guessing he had QT and that was plenty for him to call down. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
[ QUOTE ]
I believe I really blew this one by calling these bets. Any comments??? [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean "calling these bets"? You took the lead from the flop onward. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
I think a better line would be to lead the flop and hope the BB raises which will confront the 2 remaining players with a double bet. By check raising you only tie the other players to the pot.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
i like this line
i prefer to check raise the flop - the stronger my hand the more inclined i am to check raise - i dont have a power house but enough to adopt my usual plan - with 3 way action on offer i also cap the flop i think raising pre-flop is a reasonable proposition stripsqueez - chickenhawk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
[ QUOTE ]
By check raising you only tie the other players to the pot. [/ QUOTE ] Which is always good as they pay you more money. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs Hand
[ QUOTE ]
Which is always good as they pay you more money. [/ QUOTE ] True. However, I always try to thin the feild as soon as possible in large pots. Maybe I'm overusing this concept though... |
|
|