#1
|
|||
|
|||
multi-tabling, which is more effective?
For instance:
4-tabling .50/1 with a bankroll of 600, or 2-tabling 1/2. Which is generally accepted as more profitable/effective? Assume you can regularly beat both games. Thanks for your input, Cheers, fox |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
Bankroll doesn't work that way. This belongs in micro-limit.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
if you're going to play appropriate board nazi, do some inferring to the limits that this board is about.
Which is more effective, 4-tabling 5/10 or 2-tabling 3/6. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
Wrong forum. Try the internet one.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
.5/1 is def softer than 1/2, it also depends on how much your game suffers while multitabling, but id do 4 .5/1, actually id do 4 1/2, but between 4 .5/1 and 2 1/2, id choose 4 .5/1
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
If anything multitabling slightly (very slightly) reduces variance. $600 is an appropriate BR for both those games.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
[ QUOTE ]
If anything multitabling slightly (very slightly) reduces variance. $600 is an appropriate BR for both those games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when? We all know multitabling reduces your winrate, since you can't play each table as attentively. A lower overall winrate means higher variance. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If anything multitabling slightly (very slightly) reduces variance. $600 is an appropriate BR for both those games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when? We all know multitabling reduces your winrate, since you can't play each table as attentively. A lower overall winrate means higher variance. [/ QUOTE ] yeah but you get more hands per hour, therfore you get to the "long-run" 4 times faster |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: multi-tabling, which is more effective?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If anything multitabling slightly (very slightly) reduces variance. $600 is an appropriate BR for both those games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when? We all know multitabling reduces your winrate, since you can't play each table as attentively. A lower overall winrate means higher variance. [/ QUOTE ] How can it not reduce your variance? Variance has nothing to do with your winrate. You have have a negative winrate and have a zero variance. |
|
|