|
|
#1
11-19-2005, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Aggression
I was just looking at my agression levels, and I am a 4.5/3.5/2 over my last 20k hands. I know I am agressive, but those numbers seem really high, and I don't feel THAT agressive. Should I definetly be trying to lower these numbers, or could they possibly be ok depending on my style?
|
|
#2
11-19-2005, 01:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agression
[ QUOTE ]
I was just looking at my agression levels, and I am a 4.5/3.5/2 over my last 20k hands. I know I am agressive, but those numbers seem really high, and I don't feel THAT agressive. Should I definetly be trying to lower these numbers, or could they possibly be ok depending on my style? [/ QUOTE ] could be you are folding too much, could be you are betting/raising too much. i think it's too "aggressive" but i could be wrong. mine are like 2.7/2.2/1.7 or something close to it. but its so dependent on playing style that it doesnt matter. just play your game.
|
|
#5
11-19-2005, 01:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agression
[ QUOTE ]
agression is calculated by taking your bet and raise over your call. You probably just aren't doing very much calling. Folding isn't factored into the equation, so folding has nothing to do with it. blake [/ QUOTE ] Folding is related to calling. If I am folding too often, rather than calling, that would raise my Agg. levels.
|
|
#6
11-19-2005, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agression
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] agression is calculated by taking your bet and raise over your call. You probably just aren't doing very much calling. Folding isn't factored into the equation, so folding has nothing to do with it. blake [/ QUOTE ] Folding is related to calling. If I am folding too often, rather than calling, that would raise my Agg. levels. [/ QUOTE ] That would also show up in your WTS numbers and other numbers. It is much more likely you are raising in spots you should be calling. But, yes there may be spots you should be calling down that you are folding. But folding isn't in the equation. blake
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
