![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone like to share any online poker tells. I usually watch betting habits/history..Online tells are hard so anything anyone can think of would be appreciated..
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
having one of the buttons clicked (check/call/raise) makes them make an insta-move, which gives you the tell that they clicked the button...u can then decide why they did that and what it means about their hand
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An immediate check after someone else has checked usually means they clicked the check/fold button. i.e. they dont have anything.
Thats all Ive seen. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
An immediate check after someone else has checked usually means they clicked the check/fold button. i.e. they dont have anything. Thats all Ive seen. [/ QUOTE ] I use the check/call button sometimes when I catch a monster. Be careful out there [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Insta-raise PF usually means AA-QQ, AKs, AK. Usually.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't really rely on any timing of bets, etc. because they could be thinking or posting on 2+2 or looking at porn for all your know. Online is pretty much all betting sizes and patterns, which is why PokerTracker and the like are so valuable for online play. The instacheck after someone else checks is the only thing close to a tell online, but if I know I'm going for a checkraise, I'll autocheck so I can handle another table, so its not fool proof.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've found the insta-fold button to be pretty reliable.
When they insta-fold pf, they had a weak hand. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I've found the insta-fold button to be pretty reliable. When they insta-fold pf, they had a weak hand. [/ QUOTE ] nh |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are lots of tells online. While multi-tabling i don't really notice them, but if I am concentrating on one table I can get a lot of tells. Others on this forum will disagree but that is only because they suck at reading people online and rely soley on their pokertracker stats (i'm not saying there is anything wrong with that).
|
![]() |
|
|