#1
|
|||
|
|||
So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
Am I ready for 2-4?. Next month is my move to 2-4, with no going down again anymore. Plan is to move up 1 limit a month, after 120 hours of play per month.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
I wouldnt move up based on time, but more based on bankroll and improvement of skill. If you dont have the bankroll for 2/4, then stay at 1/2 until you build it up. The BB/100 hands looks fine.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
Am I ready for 2-4?. Next month is my move to 2-4, with no going down again anymore. Plan is to move up 1 limit a month, after 120 hours of play per month.
I really just should have ignored this post, however I couldnt. Do a search on pet peeves on posting styles. This type of post made me stop visiting this forum for a bit. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
What?.
English please. I'm moving up no matter what. I just wanted to know if 3.5 BB/100 3-tabling at 1-2 was outstanding, good, average or bad. After that many hands, THAT has to be very near my rate (at 1-2). I have played up to 5-10 at the start, and came crashing down to the micro-limits. That WILL NOT happen again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
think so, but dont think you can move up one limit/month for very long.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
mike:
[ QUOTE ] This type of post made me stop visiting this forum for a bit. [/ QUOTE ] ???? I do not get it. Sure, it is not an advanced strategy question, and this type of question has been done to death.....but is it really enough to drive you away? Just look at the posts on currently on the first page of the SS forum. The vast majority are strategy questions. Maybe not as advanced or interesting as posts in the "prime" of the SS forum, but still very worth while. And, BTW, I for one am glad you are posting again. I always valued your opinions. Welcome back. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] --Rico |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
After that many hands, THAT has to be very near my rate (at 1-2).
After a million hands, you can be very confident of your win rate +/- 1 BB/100 hands. So... no. And I sympathize with MG, even if I understand where the impulse comes from. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
Rico,
but is it really enough to drive you away? Not really, slight exaggeration by me. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] And, BTW, I for one am glad you are posting again. I always valued your opinions. Welcome back. Thanks for the kinds words. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
And I sympathize with MG, even if I understand where the impulse comes from.
You feel my pain? Did you ever get the password to the Poo-bah lounge? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So is 3.5 BB/100 HHs any good after 75,000 hands at 1-2, 3 tabling?
Bauulucky,
Buy and read Gambling Theory and Other Topics from the Mason. |
|
|