#1
|
|||
|
|||
Odd WSOP Hypothetical
There's a post on RGP about this...people here must be better thinkers.
First hand at WSOP main event. Table of 10. 7 players ahead of you go all in. You look down at AA. Do you call? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
What an original question!
Yes I call. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
[ QUOTE ]
What an original question! [/ QUOTE ] Haha! nh |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
[ QUOTE ]
There's a post on RGP about this...people here must be better thinkers. First hand at WSOP main event. Table of 10. 7 players ahead of you go all in. You look down at AA. Do you call? [/ QUOTE ] This has only been asked about fifty times on 2+2. If you want to win the tournament, of course you call. Search the archives if you want an in-depth analysis of why. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
Hey, thanks for making fun of the new guy. You folks are real friendly 'round these parts
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
an interesting spin on this problem is, what if 7 people ahead of you went all in, but you saw that the 7th guy had AA also?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
I don't think he meant to be rude, but this one really HAS been done to death each Spring. Defo will be near the top if they ever get FAQs going.....
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
That probably wouldn't matter to me. I'd have already assumed that the other two aces were gone (AKs twice)
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
I muck. I want my WSOPME to last longer than 1 hand. For me its more about the expierence than trying to win the tournament on the first hand (which BTW you cannot do obviously).
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odd WSOP Hypothetical
[ QUOTE ]
I muck. I want my WSOPME to last longer than 1 hand. For me its more about the expierence than trying to win the tournament on the first hand (which BTW you cannot do obviously). [/ QUOTE ] but isn't the "experience" about playing your best for the biggest tourney of the year? |
|
|