![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am leaving town tomorrow and have had no time to research BSPs for this week. I have some ideas but no research to back it up. There is a chance I will be able to post from the road on Saturday night. Otherwise the BSPs are on a bye for week 7.
To be honest, they need a break anyway. The BSP record so far: 1-13-1. natedogg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My bankroll doesn't need a break! I need all the locks I can get.
Get to work! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is unaccecptable.
[ QUOTE ] Get to work! [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I say somebody does some research this week taking over an an interim basis, and the BSP picks will only count against the season record if they lose like they always do. Replacement must do a solid job of research or picks can be vetoed.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We should get that guy who wrote up the New Orleans game last week to give us his picks. He was perfect [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
But if you just peruse a few consensus boards you will come away with the BSP picks of choice. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's always a good BSP choice
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I am leaving town tomorrow and have had no time to research BSPs for this week. I have some ideas but no research to back it up. There is a chance I will be able to post from the road on Saturday night. Otherwise the BSPs are on a bye for week 7. To be honest, they need a break anyway. The BSP record so far: 1-13-1. natedogg [/ QUOTE ] NOOO say it ain't so! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Asking around my office, I got KC as a possible BSP choice.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I looked at this week's lines, the first thing I thought was "KC are dogs in Miami? Sign me up!"
I've gotten over it now, but that's a very good sign that this game has BSP potential. The unstoppable Broncos against the fumbleful Giants may also tickle the BSP's fancy. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
When I looked at this week's lines, the first thing I thought was "KC are dogs in Miami? Sign me up!" [/ QUOTE ] That was pretty much what the people I asked were saying. Which is why I think it should be a BSP candidate. |
![]() |
|
|