#1
|
|||
|
|||
89s at 10/20 (not played by me)
I wasn't in this hand, but I found it interesting.
10/20 Party Poker, 10 handed. UTG + 2 limps, MP2 calls, HERO has 8 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and calls, MP4 limps, folds up to BB who calls. No signficant post-flop aggression from any of the players, save for when they have made hands. Flop: 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] BB checks, UTG+2 checks, HERO bets, MP3 raises, MP4 folds, BB folds, UTG+2 calls, HERO calls. Turn: Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG+2 checks, HERO checks, MP3 bets, UTG + 2 calls, HERO raises, MP3 calls, UTG + 2 calls. River: 10 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG + 2 checks, HERO bets, MP3 calls, UTG+2 calls. I really didn't care for how Hero played this hand. He was putting in 2.5 BB for something he could have seen for only 1.5. The pot wasn't that big to justify playing for value. Anyone want to argue otherwise? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 89s at 10/20 (not played by me)
I agree with you, I think his turn CR is baaaaaad.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 89s at 10/20 (not played by me)
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with you, I think his turn CR is baaaaaad. [/ QUOTE ] I agree completely. Wait to get that extra bet in once you make your hand. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 89s at 10/20 (not played by me)
Agreed.
- Jim |
|
|