#1
|
|||
|
|||
Phillip Rivers
Well, that holdout worked out just swimmingly.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
Yeah, if the Jets start thinking QB in the offseason, and especially if they start thinking #1 pick type QB, I'd rather just send the pick to SD for him.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
Leinart > Rivers?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
[ QUOTE ]
Leinart > Rivers? [/ QUOTE ] Dunno. Rivers certainly has the better arm, and two years practicing with NFL should make him an instant starter wherver he goes. If for some reason the Jets have a choice with either of these guys and we decide ot go QB, I'd prob go Rivers b/c Curtis, if he's got anything left, won't in 2 years when Leinert can make an impact. I"m not saying that River is going to be the best Rivers can be in his first start, but he'll be further along than Leinert is all. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
[ QUOTE ]
Well, that holdout worked out just swimmingly. [/ QUOTE ] Are you kidding? It worked out awesome for him, hes getting paid $40,000,000 guarenteed to site on the bench. He probably has the best job in the NFL edit - unless of course you were being sarcastic. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
Because Rivers was going to be a starter as a rookie, right? Right.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
[ QUOTE ]
Leinart > Rivers? [/ QUOTE ] Ask Norm Chow. He coached Leinart at USC and Rivers at N. C. State, so he would be a good judge. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
There is only one L in Philip Rivers.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
IMHO I think that they are both schmucks.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phillip Rivers
I think he was going to start because SD was basically through with Breese.
I dont think Bresse is that great a qb (maybe a little above nfl avg.) but gates and tomlinson are unbeleiveable forces which makes his job a lot easier. So i think rivers would probably be playing well for SD but is hard to bench a guy who you can count on to not the turn the ball over and make good decisions. |
|
|