#1
|
|||
|
|||
2pair vs tight/passive
MP2 is tight passive. Havent played with him enough to know if he would raise this flop with K or A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] or TPTK
Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, SB completes, Hero checks. Flop: (4 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, SB calls, Hero calls, UTG+1 folds. Turn: (5.50 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, SB calls. River: (8.50 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, SB calls. Final Pot: 11.50 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
I think the turn and river would be easier to play if you 3-bet the flop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
Hmm, we can 3 bet the flop for sure, but I'm kinda against pumping up flush draws. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] But man 3-bettign this flop would make the turn so much easier to play. See I would have tried c/r the turn considering the flop play, but based on your read villian might check through and giving freecards is another one of my pet peeves...
I guess leading the turn is fine considering you can fold to a raise. You sure he's tight passive right? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I don't know maybe that's a little weak, but yeah this hand is giving me some headaches. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
Definately TP, hes a pokertracker Mouse [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
If you held AJ here, I would say, "Well played". However, you hold top two pair, and you've got a poor soul trapped in between. Your equity edge on the flop is too high not to 3-bet IMO.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
[ QUOTE ]
If you held AJ here, I would say, "Well played". However, you hold top two pair, and you've got a poor soul trapped in between. Your equity edge on the flop is too high not to 3-bet IMO. [/ QUOTE ] Cool, so if a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] hits the turn i check call and fold the river w/out a boat? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
Not necessarily. You didn't provide a read on SB so I assume he's loose passive. If SB bets the turn, a read is vital although I may consider folding to a loose-passive.
If SB checks, I would bet here, expecting tight-passive to fold if he doesn't have a diamond. If tight-passive calls, I'll check the river then re-evaluate if he bets. If tight-passive raises, the pot is now big enough to call to draw to your boat. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
I think that you miss a ton of bets if you don't 3 bet this flop.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
MP had 44, not sure about SB
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2pair vs tight/passive
I play it the same...
You hand is worth value-betting and flopped flushes are rare. You don't have any reason to think you do not have the best hand at the moment. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|