#1
|
|||
|
|||
\"Five-our of spades.\"
What is this supposed to be? I understand the concept being discussed, and it doesn't affect it's telling; I'm just wondering what this typo was really supposed to be.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
five-*four* of spades. I was confused too until I read the next paragraph down.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
Well that's certainly the most obvious and what I would have guessed but the 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] is on Lester's board. I also see no reason why anyone would think DS had specifically spades in any event as his board is [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
But his door was a spade, and it's more likely he would have started suited than backed into a flushdraw. (I don't know what it means anymore though, since the 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] is on Lester's board).
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
maybe he meant 5,4 or spades but I still don't see anyone putting him on a flush draw as he would only have 3 suited at this point.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Sklansky [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
I'm still concerned about the two 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] that seem to be in this deck. Live poker is rigged.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Five-our of spades.\"
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still concerned about the two 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] that seem to be in this deck. Live poker is rigged. [/ QUOTE ] The whole article was disjointed and poorly done. It did not flow from point to point well, and i think several of his points were not made. This was a very ameturish effort by DS [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Paging Mr Sklansky
lol missed that 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] thing. Anyhow I don't agree with the following poster about it being disjointed; I found it pretty easy to follow and instructive - just like to know what the boards really were on this first part.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Paging Mr Sklansky
It was five four of spades. Shouldn't have been in other hands.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|