#1
|
|||
|
|||
87s - River bluff
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
CO ($201.65) Button ($194.10) SB ($233.15) BB ($327.95) UTG ($52) UTG+1 ($192) MP1 ($222.85) MP2 ($330.98) Hero ($200) Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $1. <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $8</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB (poster) calls $7, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $23</font>, Hero calls $17, SB calls $17. Flop: ($75) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $50</font>, SB folds, BB calls $50. Turn: ($175) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, Hero checks. River: ($175) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $25</font>, Hero calls $125 (All-In) Villain is a nit and the river looks like an obvious blocking bet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
I am folding to the re-raise PF but I am a virtual n00b at NL and probably weak-tight.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
Why didn't you push the turn? Had a chance to represent trip jacks or a flush. What kind of hand reraises preflop from the BB and c/c's the flop, checks turn?? AK/TT/99?? You should get TT/99 to fold to a turn push, and you are value betting against AK.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
[ QUOTE ]
Why didn't you push the turn? Had a chance to represent trip jacks or a flush. What kind of hand reraises preflop from the BB and c/c's the flop, checks turn?? AK/TT/99?? You should get TT/99 to fold to a turn push, and you are value betting against AK. [/ QUOTE ] i think the guy had AA/KK/QQ, and i was done after the flop until the river came and he made (what i thought was) an obvious blocking bet. i figured there's no way that he'd call without the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or maybe the K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
I don't like it. After your push the pot is 225 and he has 100 to call. I think K/Q/J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] all make a crying call because when someone trys to represent a hand they backed into there;s a higher than normal chance they're bluffing, in my experience. Surely with a high club and a hand worth betting on the flop you'd have got active on the turn.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
Actually I think this is a pretty good spot for a bluff....assuming he's a decent player that $25 is such an obvious blocking bet with a hand that is good but doesn't have clubs in it....he can't beat anyone with a club or even a jack in their hand with an overpair as long as it doesn't contain a club.....if this doesn't work then you at least know that you will probably get some action later.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
How good is the nit at hand reading? You're basically representing QQ-AA with the [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], right? I would think your turn check would put doubt in a villain's mind as to the authenticity of the river bet. With that and pot odds, I expect you'd get a call from half the clubs still out.
I agree with earlier poster, if villain is really a nit I'd try to fold him at the turn. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
Even if it's an obvious blocking bet, nits tend to still call when raised with one pair hands. He's also getting over 3:1 on the call, so I see him folding very few better hands.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
Did wtfsvi's river overbet with the same hand in a similar situation inspire this? </hijack>
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 87s - River bluff
[ QUOTE ]
Did wtfsvi's river overbet with the same hand in a similar situation inspire this? </hijack> [/ QUOTE ] interesting. no, i hadn't seen that thread, but i just read through it. his seems a little more risky. |
|
|