Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2005, 09:47 AM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Calling down with second pair against an LAG

Button is 25/14/5.2 after 100 hands. BB is 37/7/.7 after 50. I think normally I might bet into the button so he could raise me and drive out the BB, but in this situation:

1. I'm pretty likely to be behind anyway
2. BB is very passive, and I don't mind him calling, he doesn't have all that many outs
3. I wan't button to bluff as much as possible if he is behind


Poker 3/6 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (9.33 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, BB calls, Hero calls.

Turn: (6.16 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, BB calls, Hero calls.

River: (9.16 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, BB calls, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 12.16 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:24 AM
brazilio brazilio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

I don't possibly see how overcalling the river is ok, if somebody disagrees I'd like to hear it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2005, 10:46 AM
witeknite witeknite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finally at Party
Posts: 121
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

Do you not like the river overcall because of the K, or just in general?

WiteKnite
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:06 AM
disjunction disjunction is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 79
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

[ QUOTE ]
Do you not like the river overcall because of the K, or just in general?

WiteKnite

[/ QUOTE ]

The king is really bad. I think it's close without it. The good news is that a loose passive BB will often have a pocket pair that he's holding onto for dear life. The bad news is that at the button is not an LAG preflop, so his 3-bet range here doesn't contain many hands you beat.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2005, 11:43 AM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

[ QUOTE ]
The king is really bad. I think it's close without it. The good news is that a loose passive BB will often have a pocket pair that he's holding onto for dear life. The bad news is that at the button is not an LAG preflop, so his 3-bet range here doesn't contain many hands you beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that the king sucks. I think we are still beating TT and other pocket pairs that may have 3-bet us. He is super agro, so I could see him pushing to the river with a severe underpair. Maybe this isn't enough though, as he has a hell of a lot of hands that do beat us.


[ QUOTE ]
I don't possibly see how overcalling the river is ok, if somebody disagrees I'd like to hear it.


[/ QUOTE ]

Is it the overcalling or the calling you disagree with? Because I am really not worried at all about BB. Do you call if BB folds?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2005, 12:19 PM
brazilio brazilio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

[ QUOTE ]

Is it the overcalling or the calling you disagree with? Because I am really not worried at all about BB. Do you call if BB folds?

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem is that the BB is loose, but it's an infrequent fish that'll call down with something you beat when that King hits. In addition, the guy isn't a maniac, he's just an overaggressive TAG that may be overly loose, but if he is it's close. He'd be just as hard pressed to value bet something you beat here 3-way. I think it's pretty neutral one way or the other to call it HU, but 3-way it verges on suck to me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2005, 12:20 PM
rory rory is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

Since when is 25/14 loose?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2005, 12:39 PM
disjunction disjunction is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 79
Default Re: Calling down with second pair against an LAG

[ QUOTE ]


I agree that the king sucks. I think we are still beating TT and other pocket pairs that may have 3-bet us. He is super agro, so I could see him pushing to the river with a severe underpair. Maybe this isn't enough though, as he has a hell of a lot of hands that do beat us.



[/ QUOTE ]

From the stats you posted, he's an LAG postflop but not preflop. My PFR is 4% higher than his, and I do not reraise a heck of a lot of hands that you beat. Maybe TT and 99 and JTs.

One other observation, from chat at a live poker table once, is that some LAGs are LAGs because they have only one thing on their mind, "don't let anyone chase", which makes them calm down against 2 opponents on the river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.