|
|
#1
09-12-2005, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
2nd pair vs. a LAG and a calling station
I have KQo in BB.
A LAG raises from MP, a calling station calls, and I call. The LAG likes to raise with any ace or any pp. Flop is AKx. I know if I bet into the LAG he'll raise no matter what he has, so I check, the LAG bets and the callin station calls. Call down, fold or what? 
|
|
#2
09-12-2005, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2nd pair vs. a LAG and a calling station
Regardless you have odds to make the call on the flop w/ your 5-outter getting 8.5:1. You mentioned that the LAG likes raising with any PP or Ace, but is he capable of betting 99 or whatever on a AKx flop? Also, give us an example of why you consider the other villian a "station". Have you seen him coldcall before?
|
|
#3
09-12-2005, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2nd pair vs. a LAG and a calling station
i would call the flop and fold the turn unimproved if he bets again.
|
|
#5
09-12-2005, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2nd pair vs. a LAG and a calling station
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Flop is AKx. I know if I bet into the LAG he'll raise no matter what he has, so I check ... [/ QUOTE ] That's a perfect reason to bet not check. [/ QUOTE ] yeah you should be betting to raise out the LPP
|
|
#6
09-12-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2nd pair vs. a LAG and a calling station
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Flop is AKx. I know if I bet into the LAG he'll raise no matter what he has, so I check ... [/ QUOTE ] That's a perfect reason to bet not check. [/ QUOTE ] yeah you should be betting to raise out the LPP [/ QUOTE ] hmm...interesting thoughts- why? if we're not already behind to the LAG, do we think LPP are folding an Ace here? what are we trying to fold here?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
