|
|
#1
08-14-2005, 11:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
10 team ESPN league
I have the 9th pick in Rd.1 QB Hasselbeck (8.2) RB McGehee (1.9) T. Bell (3.9) Carnell Williams (5.9) JJ Arrington (6.2) M. Anderson (12.2) Clarret (16.2) WR Moss (2.2) Clayton (4.2) Porter (7.9) Bennett (9.9) Stokely (11.9) K. Colbert (13.9) TE: Clark (10.2) K: Longwell (14.2) Def Vikings (15.9) 
|
|
#3
08-14-2005, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
Good pickup of Arrington, you might very well need him since McGahee could potentially have trouble getting in the endzone with Losman at QB and Bell isn't necessarily guaranteed to be a consistent starter with all those running backs in Denver.
|
|
#5
08-14-2005, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and Bell isn't necessarily guaranteed to be a consistent starter with all those running backs in Denver. [/ QUOTE ] m. anderson m. clarett [/ QUOTE ] Is that it? I thought they had more... Nevermind then
|
|
#6
08-14-2005, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] and Bell isn't necessarily guaranteed to be a consistent starter with all those running backs in Denver. [/ QUOTE ] m. anderson m. clarett [/ QUOTE ] Is that it? I thought they had more... Nevermind then [/ QUOTE ] plus Q. Griffin and r. dayne, but i don't think they are factors
|
|
#7
08-15-2005, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
Am I out of line wondering why you took 3 Denver RBs, not to mention 3 rookie RBs, as well as only one QB (and its HASSELBECK?!?!)...
Now, I'd have to know who was on the board when you went Bronco-crazy...but wow. At least 2 of your RB picks are a total waste if one feature back comes out of that mess.
|
|
#8
08-15-2005, 12:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
I am not a big fan of just drafting one quaterback.
Some of your late round ricks are very good (Mike Anderson was a steal) Many of your picks are based on potencial... hopefully these players pan out.
|
|
#9
08-15-2005, 03:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
[ QUOTE ]
Am I out of line wondering why you took 3 Denver RBs, not to mention 3 rookie RBs, as well as only one QB (and its HASSELBECK?!?!)... Now, I'd have to know who was on the board when you went Bronco-crazy...but wow. At least 2 of your RB picks are a total waste if one feature back comes out of that mess. [/ QUOTE ] his lineup is not set in stone...when the situation clears he drops #3 and gets his backup QB. A serviceable QB for Hass's bye week ought to be availible...the difference between the 20th and 25th QB isn't much, etc etc.
|
|
#10
08-15-2005, 08:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: another ho-hum \'rate my draft\' post
[ QUOTE ]
I am not a big fan of just drafting one quaterback. [/ QUOTE ] I wish I was allowed to draft just one quarterback. Unless your dealing with an injury, where your scrambling anyway, my normal default for a bye week is just to find the available QB playing the worst passing defense. Your much more likely to be unable to find a decent running back on the waiver-wire than you are to not be able to find a QB with a good match-up.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
