Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2005, 04:27 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default is the \'worst case\' here BETTER than not getting involved?

PokerStars Game #2322478205: Tournament #11217395, Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2005/08/12 - 16:05:52 (ET)
Table '11217395 1' Seat #2 is the button
Seat 2: bluefeet (4575 in chips)
Seat 3: BTSinAustin (1740 in chips)
Seat 4: digdug2000 (665 in chips)
Seat 7: bejens (1445 in chips)
Seat 8: 1BigDave (5075 in chips)
BTSinAustin: posts small blind 200
digdug2000: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bluefeet [8c 9h]
bejens: folds
1BigDave: folds
bluefeet: raises 1600 to 2000
BTSinAustin: folds
digdug2000: calls 240 and is all-in

I will readily admit that 98o probably doesn't hold up that great to BB's 'any two' here. My deciding factor was to keep SB from getting these chips. Something told me I could afford to donate t600 here. Worst case - creating 3 bubblers with 4BB's each, leaving me 2.5+:1 edge on all three...sitting to my immediate left.

FPS maybe, but is my thinking justified IYO? l took this line for THIS reason. I was putting him in with any of my two actually.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2005, 04:31 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: is the \'worst case\' here BETTER than not getting involved?

Who cares if SB gets these chips! He's immediately on your right, if the bubble doesn't break, push any two into his SB, he will fold because the BB from this hand is short. I'm actually folding a very high percentage of my hands here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2005, 04:38 PM
Nicholasp27 Nicholasp27 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: is the \'worst case\' here BETTER than not getting involved?

i'd think sb is gonna raise any2 since bb is down to 200 chips and so sb can donate the chips instead of you, making the situation better for ya
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:49 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: is the \'worst case\' here BETTER than not getting involved?

I don't like it. If you let the SB go after the BB here you will have 1 of 4 results.

BB folds, this would suck but is pretty unlikely.
SB fold, this is fine for you.
BB wins, this is fine as you still have plenty of leverage over the stacks on your left
SB wins, you are now on the bubble with 2 short stacks behind you ... this is good also.

If you push, well you get called and showdown crap which isn't going to help much when it comes time to steal all their blinds.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:50 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: is the \'worst case\' here BETTER than not getting involved?

[ QUOTE ]
Who cares if SB gets these chips! He's immediately on your right, if the bubble doesn't break, push any two into his SB, he will fold because the BB from this hand is short. I'm actually folding a very high percentage of my hands here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I'm pushing a lot but I want some showdown value on my hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.