#1
|
|||
|
|||
2 hands of varrying aggression
30/60, 7 handed
hand 1 no read on utg, but LP is an aggo idiot, the classical meaning of LAG, though he's not the type to raise and cap without pure nothing, though he is quite liberal about betting whenever he feels like it. utg raises. LP 3-bets. i cap in the sb with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. bb folds. utg calls. LP calls. 3 to the flop for 13 small ones. flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] check. check. check. 3 to the turn for 6.5 big ones. turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] i bet. utg folds. LP calls. HU for 8.5 big ones. river: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] i bet. LP raises. i 3-bet intending to call a cap. hand 2: same LP player opens. i 3-bet from my sb with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. he calls. flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] i check. he bets. i call. turn: 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] i check. he bets. i call. river: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] i check. he bets. i call. how'd i do? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
Both hands seem good and standard.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
[ QUOTE ]
Both hands seem good and standard. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, sure. Did you see the action in hand 1? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
Wrong forum? This is small stakes... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
To me the river in Hand 1 is the most intresting street in all the hands. I think hand 2 is standard IMO.
Would the lag cap the river of Hand 1 with pretty much any A? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
[ QUOTE ]
Wrong forum? This is small stakes... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ALWAYS glad to see hands/comments from this poster. bc |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
[ QUOTE ]
Wrong forum? This is small stakes... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Are you the guy that posted a textbook hand reading exercise and the answer was 47o? Hands that CDC posts are always appreciated here, regardless of the limits. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
<yawn>
This was the most constructive post you could come up with? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
Lemme see in hand one CDC checks the flop because he feels LP will raise a lot. Turn he bets because the flop was checked through. River he 3-bets because LP would've bet 9s or 4s on the flop.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 hands of varrying aggression
And your response confirms just how childish you are.
Grow up - this forum is not a vehicle for your petulant vendettas. |
|
|