Moving from NL $50 to NL $100

[guaranteedBluff]

I have been, for about a month, 4-tabling the NL $50 6-max tables with very good success. I've averaged (in about 10k hands) 10BB/hr*table, and have a few questions about the wisdom and means of moving up:
1) should I just add one or two 100 NL tables at first, and play the remaining tables still at 50?
2) are there any glaring differences between these two games at party?
3) will my tight agressive style (20/8/3.2) be suitable for this game?

Any other comments will be appreciated as well.

[pmuir10]

1) you can do this or just start by playing 2-3 100 tables and nothing else.
2) for me no. for you though, when you get to the 100s you will be concious about the money and how much is being thrown around each hand. with time you get used to this and you will be fine.
3)yes it will be fine.

if you can sustain that winrate at the 50s, you will have no problem beating the 100s once you get used to the amount of money you are playing with on each table.

[Voltron87]

100nl is easy. play abc, be smart, pay attention. if youve been beating 50 for a while dont worry.

[dtbog]

[ QUOTE ]
100nl is easy. play how you played at NL 50, be smart, pay attention. if youve been beating 50 for a while dont worry.

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

[dtbog]

[ QUOTE ]
1) should I just add one or two 100 NL tables at first, and play the remaining tables still at 50?

[/ QUOTE ]

If I were you I'd start with one or two tables of NL 100 and 0 tables of NL 50.

Why? Well, you're trying to get the feel of a new game. Let your brain take in all of the information that your NL 100 tables are giving you, without distracting it with something else.

Just my two cents. Good luck!

[guaranteedBluff]

makes sense. My only issue would be boredom with only two tables, but i suppose if I must i could be disciplined enough.

[RiverFenix]

Datamine 100 6max for a day or two first