Party $2/4 (6 max)

[newfant]

Why doesn't it exist? Should we start a petition? I would rather play $2/4 6-max at Party rather than having to do it at PokerStars.

[jaxUp]

It just might destroy the 2/4 full games in terms of fish. I'm sure it will come at some point though.

[thesharpie]

Hell naw. I'd rather them keep it full ring as I'm able to play more tables an hour at full handed, and adding shorthanded might turn the games shitty.

[kapw7]

Waht's wrong with Stars?

Avg Rake
PP 2/4 Full 0.94
PS 2/4 SH 0.64 32% less than full ring

PS have high speed tables where you can easily do 100hands/hr/table. So by 2-tabling and 2.5BB/100 (Less rake) you can expect 2*100*2.5*4/100= $20/hr

And much more but PS have to pay me first [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
Waht's wrong with Stars?

Avg Rake
PP 2/4 Full 0.94
PS 2/4 SH 0.64 32% less than full ring

PS have high speed tables where you can easily do 100hands/hr/table. So by 2-tabling and 2.5BB/100 (Less rake) you can expect 2*100*2.5*4/100= $20/hr

And much more but PS have to pay me first [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

uh my Party 2/4 SH tables(full games that are short) have a 1.5BB higher average potsize which means more are raked, and more are raked for more than the minimum

they use the same rake structure for 2/4, so Party just has better games

[zephed]

Party 2/4 full was pretty loose. Gotta keep some full games for those pussies.


Loose games = higher rake + good for attracting and keeping players. 3/6 needs to be loosened up more than 2/4.

[popeye18]

I pray they dont as 2/4 full is my next move. They wont do that will they? They cant! right? Someone comfort me.

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
I pray they dont as 2/4 full is my next move. They wont do that will they? They cant! right? Someone comfort me.

[/ QUOTE ]

learn how to play 5handed