#1
|
|||
|
|||
Too Reckless or Standard ?
#Game No : 2326951111
***** Hand History for Game 2326951111 ***** NL Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:13737833 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) - Friday, July 08, 21:34:19 EDT 2005 Table Table 35331 (Real Money) Seat 8 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 2: Player1 ( $978 ) Seat 8: Player2 ( $2127 ) Seat 4: Player3 ( $375 ) Seat 9: Player4 ( $2020 ) Seat 6: ASanyasi ( $1655 ) Seat 7: Player 5 ( $845 ) Trny:13737833 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to ASanyasi [ Qc Ad ] Player1 folds. ASanyasi is all-In [1655] Player2 folds. Player3 folds. Player4 calls [1580]. Player5 is all-In [828] ** Dealing Flop ** [ 2d, 8d, 6c ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ Jh ] ** Dealing River ** [ Tc ] Player1 shows [ As, Kc ] high card ace. Player2 shows [ 4d, 4h ] a pair of fours. ASanyasi shows [ Qc, Ad ] high card ace. Player1 wins 1354 chips from side pot #1 with high card ace with king kicker. Player2wins 2934 chips from the main pot with a pair of fours. ASAnyasi finished in sixth place. Table Closed <font color="white"> </font> Thanks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
Seems kinda crazy to open fold AQ here. You could raise to 400 or something. I would be surprised if the push is -$EV.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
[ QUOTE ]
I would be <font color="red">*very*</font> surprised if the push is -$EV. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Yugoslav |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
Seems standard to me...I'm doing the same thing.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
[ QUOTE ]
Seems kinda crazy to open fold AQ here. You could raise to 400 or something. I would be surprised if the push is -$EV. [/ QUOTE ] If you can fold low-->mid pocket pair here, you can fold AQ...didn't raptor have a thread about pocket 8s in a similar situation that he folded? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
Personally, I would be more than happy to take AQo against any of the shorties...but I don't like the push in the dark (in relation to the big stacks). A simple 3x here IMO would more than communicate to the big stacks that you're prepared to take on a shortie. It leaves you an exit when a big stack comes over the top, or calls -- playing the flop accordingly. Often, I'll find myself amongst big stacks teaming up on the little guys, staying out of each others ways etc....a good time for the minimal 3x stuff. BUT...I'm not so certain that my willingness to participate in this type of play isn't a leak of mine. I'd like to be the big stack that bitch-slaps the weak, fellow big stack -- knowing there is no way in hell a wimp like me would/could call [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
i dont mind a shove here. yer really only worried about 2 people jumping in there. this must be a 10+1 judging from the stack sizes and the 44 call.. but in anything above 55 or so, i would probably shove. holla
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too Reckless or Standard ?
There were 5 people left to act in that thread, 4 here. Makes a pretty large difference, enough where I would push.
|
|
|