Standard Clarkmeister?

Cumulonimbus · #1 06-13-2005, 02:42 AM

One villian is typical loose passive, other is weak tight. Clarkmeister theorum or spewing chips?

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Nimbus is BB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, 1 fold, UTG+2 calls, 3 folds, CO calls, 1 fold, SB completes, Nimbus checks.

Flop: (5 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 players)
SB checks, Nimbus bets, UTG calls, UTG+2 calls, CO calls, SB folds.

Turn: (4.50 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (4 players)
Nimbus bets, UTG folds, UTG+2 calls, CO calls.

River: (7.50 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 players)
Nimbus bets, UTG+2 calls, CO calls.

Final Pot: 10.50 BB

mantasm · #2 06-13-2005, 02:44 AM

Not standard because it's not headsup, but i think it's a good bet because the weak tight player could fold a better hand and the loose guy can call with a worse one.

damaniac · #3 06-13-2005, 02:44 AM

Clarkmeister only applies HU. Against two opponents, I probably just give up, the pot isn't that big, LP isn't folding a diamond and I'm surprised if weak-tightie made it to the river without one that doesn't want to see showdown for a bet. Plus, if they are LP and weak-tight, I think chances are somewhat less that 1) they bet, forcing you to decide if they are bluffing or not and 2) when one does bet, it's less likely they are bluffing (I think) given their player type, so the fold becomes easier. And obviously if it went check/bet/call, easy fold.

Cumulonimbus · #4 06-13-2005, 02:48 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Clarkmeister only applies HU.

[/ QUOTE ]

Damn, forgot.

mantasm · #5 06-13-2005, 02:52 AM

Doesn't really matter what it's called, i think it's still worth talking about. Which was the lpp and which was the rock?

Cumulonimbus · #6 06-13-2005, 02:57 AM

UTG+2=LP
CO=Weak tight

Entity · #7 06-13-2005, 03:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
UTG+2=LP
CO=Weak tight

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's the case, I love your river bet.

JacksonTens · #8 06-13-2005, 03:04 AM

May I ask why this post is not standard. You flopped 2pair and played it fast? Wouldn't you always bet it if you encounter zero resistance?

JT [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

mantasm · #9 06-13-2005, 03:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
UTG+2=LP
CO=Weak tight

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's the case, I love your river bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Word. Hopefully UTG calls with an ace and CO won't want to overcall even though he may have you beat.

Cumulonimbus · #10 06-13-2005, 03:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
May I ask why this post is not standard. You flopped 2pair and played it fast? Wouldn't you always bet it if you encounter zero resistance?

JT [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

4 diamonds on board. Notice the mixed opinions above - this isn't really that standard.