#1
|
|||
|
|||
2+2
What % of the people who post here do you think are winning players? 50%? 75%?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
What % of the people who post here do you think are winning players? [/ QUOTE ] A lot...maybe a majority if you count those that post in the strategy forums? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
Yeah that's why I titled it 2+2. Obviously 85% or more of all players lose long term.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
WPT - 0
Mid-high - 95% total - probably 75% |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
You're willing to give WPT credit for 0?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
I'm thinking 75% is a good estimate.
Blackjack |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah that's why I titled it 2+2. Obviously 85% or more of all players lose long term. [/ QUOTE ] I'd be surprised if 85% of all players are losers. At poker that is. Nigel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah that's why I titled it 2+2. Obviously 85% or more of all players lose long term. [/ QUOTE ] I'd be surprised if 85% of all players are losers. At poker that is. Nigel [/ QUOTE ] Me too, I'd expect the number is closer to 90%, maybe 95%. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
People who have 300+ posts in small/micro strategy sections? - 60-70% (winning, not alot, just a bit)
Mid/High 500+ - 80-90% (winning at their limit, 99.x% could crush lower) Everyone else combined? - 1-2% |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2
[ QUOTE ]
Mid-high - 95% [/ QUOTE ] bullshit. I'd say mid high has one of the higher percentages of losing players |
|
|