#1
|
|||
|
|||
How\'d they figure this out?
Consecutive holes in one odds
This article cites "Golf Digest" which says the odds of a foursome hitting 2 holes in one on a hole is 17 million to one. Where did they come up with that? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
SWAG..
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
yes
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
that is a very silly statistic, it's impossibe to cluculate odds of something like that.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
[ QUOTE ]
that is a very silly statistic, it's impossibe to cluculate odds of something like that. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe someone counted all the attempts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
If they could estimate a mean shot accuracy (average distance from the hole) for the "average player", you would have a start.
Maybe assume that "average distance from the hole" is the mean in a normal distribution, and getting a hole-in-one would correlate to the very edge of the distribution. Then again, I don't know if a normal distribution can be used for something like mean radial distance. Thoughts? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
Couldn't they use the total number of hole-in-ones over the total number of par three holes played to work out a frequency?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
[ QUOTE ]
Couldn't they use the total number of hole-in-ones over the total number of par three holes played to work out a frequency? [/ QUOTE ] Which is probably what they did...which is also why they're wrong. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
Common knowledge in golf is that the probability of a hole in one on an average par 3 hole is roughly 1 in 13,000.
That figure was probably used to come to that conclusion. Later PG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How\'d they figure this out?
[ QUOTE ]
Common knowledge in golf is that the probability of a hole in one on an average par 3 hole is roughly 1 in 13,000. [/ QUOTE ] LOL...This doesn't answer the question at all. Common knowledge based on what? That's the whole question! |
|
|