Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2005, 11:57 PM
BottlesOf BottlesOf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 863
Default How\'d they figure this out?

Consecutive holes in one odds

This article cites "Golf Digest" which says the odds of a foursome hitting 2 holes in one on a hole is 17 million to one. Where did they come up with that?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2005, 12:01 AM
RacersEdge RacersEdge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 37
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

SWAG..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2005, 01:50 AM
somethingstupid somethingstupid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 298
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

yes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2005, 01:54 AM
blaze666 blaze666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: norwich, england
Posts: 439
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

that is a very silly statistic, it's impossibe to cluculate odds of something like that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:52 AM
EliteNinja EliteNinja is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 351
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

[ QUOTE ]
that is a very silly statistic, it's impossibe to cluculate odds of something like that.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe someone counted all the attempts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-10-2005, 07:03 AM
Frequitude Frequitude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 365
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

If they could estimate a mean shot accuracy (average distance from the hole) for the "average player", you would have a start.

Maybe assume that "average distance from the hole" is the mean in a normal distribution, and getting a hole-in-one would correlate to the very edge of the distribution.

Then again, I don't know if a normal distribution can be used for something like mean radial distance.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-10-2005, 08:47 AM
maryfield48 maryfield48 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Posts: 144
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

Couldn't they use the total number of hole-in-ones over the total number of par three holes played to work out a frequency?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-10-2005, 08:49 AM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

[ QUOTE ]
Couldn't they use the total number of hole-in-ones over the total number of par three holes played to work out a frequency?

[/ QUOTE ]

Which is probably what they did...which is also why they're wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-10-2005, 11:12 AM
PokerGoblin PokerGoblin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

Common knowledge in golf is that the probability of a hole in one on an average par 3 hole is roughly 1 in 13,000.

That figure was probably used to come to that conclusion.

Later

PG
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-10-2005, 11:15 AM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: How\'d they figure this out?

[ QUOTE ]
Common knowledge in golf is that the probability of a hole in one on an average par 3 hole is roughly 1 in 13,000.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL...This doesn't answer the question at all. Common knowledge based on what? That's the whole question!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.