#1
|
|||
|
|||
Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your help!
I'd like your help for a study that I'd like to do over the next week or so. Hopefully I can learn some things and post it on here.
Under PokerTracker, please give me the total amount of hands you have in your database, what limit the stakes are for that sample, and what your win rate per 100 hands is. Next, I'd like you to your "session notes" tab and click the option "Show True Hourly Win Rate" located to the right of the session detail tag. Next, please provide your MT ratio. This is the number of tables you play at a time, on average. Finally, please provide your BB/Hr. sample. I will start with my sample for this summer so far, just to give you guys an example. Hopefully I could see some samples in excess of 20,000 to get a better idea. I'm looking for a correlation between win rate per hour and MT ratio in relation to BB/100. Basically, you're going to make money playing 1 table. But how much more are you going to make 2-tabling and 3-tabling? Is the trend linear or exponential, or is it S-shaped? Is there even a trend at all? Example: Stakes - 1/2 Hands - 3,090 BB/100 - 3.4 (I run g00t) 18.42 hours of play MT Ratio - 2.47 BB/Hr. - 5.71 Thanks in advance |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
What limits are you interested in?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
Primarily .5/1 and 1/2, as most posters here play those limits. Some play lower, some higher.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
Stakes - .5/1
Hands - 18,205 BB/100 - 1.72 302.98 hours of play MT Ratio - 2 BB/Hr. - 1.03 Stakes - .5/1 Hands - 3,178 BB/100 - 5.39 52.45 hours of play MT Ratio - 1 BB/hr - 3.26 I've been opening 2 Party tables and 1 Empire table. Not sure how to combine the two stats. KO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
In poker tracker, you can add aliases to combine different sites' stats.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
Stakes: .5/1
Hands: 31,841 BB/100: 4.76 241.63 hours of play MT Ratio: 2.21 BB/Hr.: 6.28 Stakes: 1/2 Hands: 11,232 BB/100: 1.87 108.13 hours of play MT Ratio: 1.6 BB/Hr.: 1.94 Stakes: 1/2 6-max Hands: 40,863 BB/100: 2.3 136.08 hours of play MT Ratio: 3.34 BB/Hr.: 6.9 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your help!
Party
.5/1 24337 hands bb/100 : 3.90 405.6 hours bb/hr 2.27 mt ratio 2.64 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your help!
.5/$1
4,217 hands BB/100: 6.11 $1/$2 2,667 hands BB/100: 3.07 True rates (I'm assuming you can't separate these by limit?) Hours of play: 80.15 MT Ratio - 1.32 BB/Hr: 4.23 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
Stakes - 0.50/1
Hands - 14,167 BB/100 - 4.38 216.43 hours of play MT Ratio - 1.77 (I started off taking it easy) BB/Hr. - 4.39 Stakes - 1/2 Hands - 1,902 BB/100 - 7.38 (speaking of running g00t...) 216.43 hours of play MT Ratio - 1.85 BB/Hr. - 7.74 Stakes - 1/2 6max Hands - 15,320 BB/100 - 3.55 184.4 hours of play MT Ratio - 2.20 BB/Hr. - 6.49 My hours are table hours, not real hours. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case study: Win Rate / hour vs. BB/100 and MT Ratio. Need your hel
Please post real hours
For example, if you are 2-tabling for 2 hours, I would like the results that show 2 hours of work instead of 4. |
|
|