|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Game 6 | |||
| Screech Powers |
   
|
16 | 40.00% |
| Wesley Crusher |
  
|
24 | 60.00% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
05-26-2005, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
No AL one because Roberts is the clear choice right? [/ QUOTE ] I hope this is a joke. A-Rod is the clear choice for MVP. He is leading the league by a lot in both homers and RBI's. He has 17 homers and 49 RBI's. How can you say Roberts? 
|
|
#5
05-26-2005, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No AL one because Roberts is the clear choice right? [/ QUOTE ] I hope this is a joke. A-Rod is the clear choice for MVP. He is leading the league by a lot in both homers and RBI's. He has 17 homers and 49 RBI's. How can you say Roberts? [/ QUOTE ] Roberts has a higher OBP, SLG, SB total, and he plays a tougher position. No contest.
|
|
#6
05-26-2005, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No AL one because Roberts is the clear choice right? [/ QUOTE ] I hope this is a joke. A-Rod is the clear choice for MVP. He is leading the league by a lot in both homers and RBI's. He has 17 homers and 49 RBI's. How can you say Roberts? [/ QUOTE ] Roberts has a higher OBP, SLG, SB total, and he plays a tougher position. No contest. [/ QUOTE ] I bet you that if the voting were held right now, A-Rod would beat Roberts. And Roberts has just been getting lucky. That little bitch isn't this good. A-Rod will win MVP. Bank on it.
|
|
#7
05-26-2005, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No AL one because Roberts is the clear choice right? [/ QUOTE ] I hope this is a joke. A-Rod is the clear choice for MVP. He is leading the league by a lot in both homers and RBI's. He has 17 homers and 49 RBI's. How can you say Roberts? [/ QUOTE ] Roberts has a higher OBP, SLG, SB total, and he plays a tougher position. No contest. [/ QUOTE ] I definitely don't want to get involved in the fight that is about to begin, but just because Moneyball came out doesn't me HR and RBI's are meaningless stats.
|
|
#8
05-26-2005, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
Pujols: .332 AVG, 11 HR, 39 RBI, 33 Runs, 2 SB, .404 OBP, .592 SLG, .996 OPS
Pujols is amazing but behind Abreu and Lee at this point. I don't know about the Cubbies, but the Phillies suck because their bullpen has been awful. Abreu has carried the team for the last month.
|
|
#9
05-26-2005, 09:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No AL one because Roberts is the clear choice right? [/ QUOTE ] I hope this is a joke. A-Rod is the clear choice for MVP. He is leading the league by a lot in both homers and RBI's. He has 17 homers and 49 RBI's. How can you say Roberts? [/ QUOTE ] Roberts has a higher OBP, SLG, SB total, and he plays a tougher position. No contest. [/ QUOTE ] I bet you that if the voting were held right now, A-Rod would beat Roberts. And Roberts has just been getting lucky. That little bitch isn't this good. A-Rod will win MVP. Bank on it. [/ QUOTE ] If that is true, then the writers are mentally challenged. There is in no way that ARod is possibly better.
|
|
#10
05-26-2005, 09:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL MVP so far?
[ QUOTE ]
Pujols: .332 AVG, 11 HR, 39 RBI, 33 Runs, 2 SB, .404 OBP, .592 SLG, .996 OPS Pujols is amazing but behind Abreu and Lee at this point. I don't know about the Cubbies, but the Phillies suck because their bullpen has been awful. Abreu has carried the team for the last month. [/ QUOTE ] Tell me the last time a MVP came from a last place team? They might have better stats, but that wasn't the question. MVP is for winners. Not because I say so, but because that is how it has been.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
