Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2005, 07:06 PM
Yobz Yobz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bonus whoring Party/InterPoker
Posts: 566
Default PF question (77 in SB)

playing 2/4 and a pretty average table all of a sudden has 6 limpers to me. I have 77 in the SB and the BB will call (he is loose), I raise.

How does that sound?

Then, the flop comes KJ8 rainbow or something like that. I check/fold.

Seems pretty basic, but I wanted to make sure I was maximizing value here...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2005, 07:53 PM
Yobz Yobz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bonus whoring Party/InterPoker
Posts: 566
Default Re: PF question (77 in SB)

no opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2005, 07:59 PM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RIP Mitch Hedberg
Posts: 1,097
Default Re: PF question (77 in SB)

I vote no...

A lot of 77s equity comes from when it hits a set on the turn/river, which you might not be there to see. So, though you do have an equity edge, it might not be realized.

I would like it A LOT more if you were the button, as it might get you a free turn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2005, 08:04 PM
brazilio brazilio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: PF question (77 in SB)

Since you're playing for set value, 7.5:1, and some bizarre gutshot or OESD value I don't think it's all that bad, although I don't see much equity there especially as you're first to act come the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2005, 08:18 PM
admiralfluff admiralfluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 540
Default Re: PF question (77 in SB)

I don't like a raise here.

Yes, 77 does have an equity edge, but as Ish said, a lot of that edge is derived from when you flop a set. When you hit your set your equity skyrockets, and it is easier to push that bigger edge when you don't raise pf IMO.

You sacrifice value on a small equity edge preflop, for the potential to push a large one postflop, where it will be easier to slow play when correct, go for a c/r ...

I don't think raising on the button for a free turn is worth it, as it will also usually prevent you from getting 2 bets in on the flop when you flop a set.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2005, 08:32 PM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RIP Mitch Hedberg
Posts: 1,097
Default Re: PF question (77 in SB)

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like a raise here.

Yes, 77 does have an equity edge, but as Ish said, a lot of that edge is derived from when you flop a set. When you hit your set your equity skyrockets, and it is easier to push that bigger edge when you don't raise pf IMO.

You sacrifice value on a small equity edge preflop, for the potential to push a large one postflop, where it will be easier to slow play when correct, go for a c/r ...


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure if you meant to respond to me, because I agree that calling is best here...

but, I would say that it is easier to push your edge if you raised preflop, however.

Simply because in a 7 way raised pot (14sb) players tend to
put more bets in than a 7 way unraised pot (7sbs). Larger pots tie players to seeing turns/rivers/showdowns.

[ QUOTE ]

I don't think raising on the button for a free turn is worth it, as it will also usually prevent you from getting 2 bets in on the flop when you flop a set.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was debated pretty heavily with 44 here and here.

I think 6 limpers and 77 on the button, a raise is pretty easy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.