NoLimit = Pool, Limit = Chess?

[Shaman]

Would it be accurate to say that a pool player, because of his "hustling nature", be a better candidate for nolimit than limt? While the chess player, because of his "studiousness", be a better candidate for limit than nolimit?

[axioma]

no.

[jojobinks]

[ QUOTE ]
no.

[/ QUOTE ]

[DaveKForty7]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
no.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[OrangeKing]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
no.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably not.

[Yosemite Mark]

(Can't believe anyone has replied with this yet)

The answer is no. Do you see why?

[RiverDood]

The only way to rebut an analogy is to come back with an even weirder one. So that's my contender.

And when we're done with politics, we can try:
NoLimit = Pepper; Limit = Salt
NoLimit = NASCAR; Limit = Bowling
NoLimit = Alaska; Limit = Hawaii
NoLimit = Spiderman; Limit = Batman
NoLimit = 4th of July; Limit = Labor Day
NoLimit = Google; Limit = Library of Congress
NoLimit = Bill Clinton; Limit = Hilary Clinton
(that's actually the best of the bunch.)

[jtr]

So you're saying Bill Clinton is Spiderman, is that it?

[PokerFink]

"Limit is like sex with a condom. In no way simple, but less to fear.
No limit is like sex without a condom. Fun as all hell, but more to worry about."

- Billymonk

[DRKEVDC]

Would it be safe to say that a pool hustler makes a lot more money that a chess hustler. If those even exist?