Best way to get rid of the bot..

[emonrad87]

... is, IMO, for multiple 2+2'ers to keep following him around and getting into his tables. I think it's clear that he is easy for us to beat. If we can get him to have 2-3 losing days in a row, maybe the author will give up on it.

[BusterStacks]

Hiding the bot from search is a simple step that will ensure profitability. I wouldn't be suprised if we see this VERY soon.

[emonrad87]

Yea, but the thing is, the search function doesnt update fast enough for people to get into his tables based on it. You just have to open all the new tables when he gets KO'd.

[crazy canuck]

Did anybody e-mail party? Did anybody get a response?

[emonrad87]

There is a thread about this on the main page.

[Burno]

I've heard of party distributing bot/collusion funds back to players involved. Could playing a SNG with the bot be a semi-freeroll of sorts?

[FishBurger]

[ QUOTE ]
... is, IMO, for multiple 2+2'ers to keep following him around and getting into his tables. I think it's clear that he is easy for us to beat. If we can get him to have 2-3 losing days in a row, maybe the author will give up on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds -EV to me. If this does turn out to be a computer program, it's weird that the creator made almost no attempt to make it appear human. A few limps here and there would make this thing much more difficult to detect.

[Wabby]

Emonrad ->>

I have not seen this thing play, but please tell me more about how it plays and how we can beat it?

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
There is a thread about this on the main page.

[/ QUOTE ]

I cannot find it and I would like to know a bit more about this, like for example its handle.

[Baulucky]

[ QUOTE ]
... is, IMO, for multiple 2+2'ers to keep following him around and getting into his tables. I think it's clear that he is easy for us to beat. If we can get him to have 2-3 losing days in a row, maybe the author will give up on it.

[/ QUOTE ]


Why waste time picking up peanuts inside a diamond mine?.