A request to posters in this forum

[the alex]

Can you please not subject your threads with the blinds and your opponent and not give any other information? I've browsed this forum for over a year and just recently began posting. I, like many people will not read every thread. All we know about the threads before reading them are through the subjects. Please be more descriptive.

"5/10NL against a pro" is not a topic of discussion.

Thank you.

[istewart]

wtf

[the alex]

[ QUOTE ]
wtf

[/ QUOTE ]

Some threads on the first 2 pages of the "Mid-, High Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em" forum":

"5-10 PL hand against Tommy Angelo"

This thread is about calling a raise with AJs PF and hitting a J high flop and so on. It has nothing to do with 5/10 and everyone knows that this is a mid-stakes game because of the forum that it exists in. Tommy Angelo is significant, but as a general situation, not as Tommy Angelo.

"5/10NL vs. known prfessional"

This thread is about limping with a medium pair, calling a bet with having an overpair on the flop with 2 suited cards, hitting a set on the turn and betting the pot to see the third card to a flush on the river heads up with a "known professional." The initial post is about calling the flop with the best hand seeing the opponent as a LAG on a draw, improves the hand on the turn, and sees a river that would've made the draw that "Hero" put "Villian" on while calling the flop.

"Bellagio 10/20 NL Hand"

This thread has nothing to do with Bellagio and mentioning that it is a 10/20 game at Bellagio is good detail for the body of the post. But the topic of discussion is about hitting a J high flop with KJo in LP betting the flop and turn with the top pair, seeing an Ace on the river and being in a position where his opponent led into him.

[riverboatking]

so are you asking us to kow-tow to your laziness?
or should we be so concerned as to whether or not you read our post without bothering to respond that we should make sure to just write out the entire post in the subject line?

give me a break.

[Usagi_yo]

Is this a troll?

I just started reading here and I'm finding it usefull. The Blinds + opponant are alot better then 1000 posts with the subject "Did I play this right?", "How would you play this"? et al.

[technologic]

stfu

[BaronVonCP]

it doesn't fit in the box[ QUOTE ]
hitting a J high flop with KJo in LP betting the flop and turn with the top pair, seeing an Ace on the river and being in a position where his opponent led into him.

[/ QUOTE ]

[GFunk911]

Maybe I'm just gonna subject myself to flames, but I basically agree.

Titles with the limit and opponent are fine at all, and I certainly click on the ones that look interesting, but they don't do a great job of describing the hand.

I personally do try to do this, with titles such as "Turn Weak Top Pair in a Small Pot" and "Flop a Huge Draw Against a Calling Station." However, to each his own.

Please resume your regularly scheduled flaming.

[LuvDemNutz]

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'm just gonna subject myself to flames, but I basically agree.

Titles with the limit and opponent are fine at all, and I certainly click on the ones that look interesting, but they don't do a great job of describing the hand.

I personally do try to do this, with titles such as "Turn Weak Top Pair in a Small Pot" and "Flop a Huge Draw Against a Calling Station." However, to each his own.

Please resume your regularly scheduled flaming.

[/ QUOTE ]

stfu

[GFunk911]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'm just gonna subject myself to flames, but I basically agree.

Titles with the limit and opponent are fine at all, and I certainly click on the ones that look interesting, but they don't do a great job of describing the hand.

I personally do try to do this, with titles such as "Turn Weak Top Pair in a Small Pot" and "Flop a Huge Draw Against a Calling Station." However, to each his own.

Please resume your regularly scheduled flaming.

[/ QUOTE ]

stfu

[/ QUOTE ]

Your flame would have been more efficient if you made the subject "stfu (nt)."