#1
|
|||
|
|||
Party 15/30 Protect or pump
Party Poker 15/30 Hold'em (9 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is SB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, Hero calls, BB calls, MP1 calls, MP3 calls. Flop: (10 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333"> Hero?? A)bet out hoping to get a raise from the button and then just call getting two SB from the field. Lead the turn. B) bet out, hoping the button raises and then 3 bet forcing the field to call two more cold preflop and possibly thining the field. C) go for the check raise on the flop forcing the field to call 2 cold. My action and the results later. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
well betting out on this flop is definitely the standard. whether to 3bet or just call then leading the turn is a little more complex. i havent seen any good threads on this matter. in my opinion, if the board is rainbow and uncoordinated id just call and lead the turn if there are callers from my bet. if its coordinated and nonrainbow id 3bet.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
i would lead out and 3-bet a flop raise from the button.
a couple of reasons: 1) the button might not bet the flop 2) obvious value on the initial flop bet 3) if you 3-bet the button a gutshot or mid/bottom pair will probably call anyways |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
my arguement for calling and leading the turn is you force the callers in the middle to pay 1 more bet when they will rarely have the correct odds to do so. then if you lead the turn they may have to continue chasing without correct odds, and the button will probably raise his overpair, so you gain far more bets.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
"C" is definitely the worst option of the 3. Chances are most of the field is drawing mostly dead and I would try to sandwich them for as many bets as I can. I would lead out and 3-bet if raised and then lead out again. If PF raiser caps I might try to C/R the turn but I would really like to get a bunch of turn calls instead of just 2 from the raiser.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
my arguement for calling and leading the turn is you force the callers in the middle to pay 1 more bet when they will rarely have the correct odds to do so.
yeah but they will likely call two after you lead out. most mid/bottom pairs are gonna call one then two anyways, and the board seems to have a good amount of gutshot draws that will also do the same. leading the turn is prolly the best move no matter what. of course all this in contingent on the button doing all the playing back at us. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
Given your relative position to the PFR, I'm with sublime here. At PP 15/30 they will call; get in as many bets as you can.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
oh ok i dont play PP15. in the live games im in the players will be more inclined to fold for 2 bets in comparison to 1.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
Lets say you lead, 2 call and the button raises(as he may with a gutshot, overpair, ten and many other things on Party). If you 3 bet, you will either get the limpers to fold having put in 1SB, or call 2 more drawing to a gutshot or with a pair(which is drawing nearly dead). Also, leading ensures that it will not get checked around if the button has AK or something else he doesnt want to bet. I dont think the decision is close here.
In passive games, you may be better off checkraising so that the limpers do not get odds with gutshots. In your typical agressive game, you can expect to get raised when you bet, so there is no need to worry about giving people odds. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 15/30 Protect or pump
I lead this flop.
|
|
|