Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2004, 11:51 AM
AA suited AA suited is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

Party $30/3

Prize structure
SNG: 5x/3x/2x
MTT: 9x/7.5x/6x/4.5x/3x

Time
SnG: ~1hr to complete
MTT: ~2hrs to complete

Analysis
MTT: For $33, you can win $270 for a profit of $237.
SNG: In that same time frame (2hrs), u can spend $66 and win $300, for a profit of $234.

MTT: Top 5 win $, thus 5/30 = 16.67%
SNG: Top 3 win $, thus 3/10 = 30%

No Hand Histories for MTT (you have to remember to manually request after every 100 hands, which is a pain). You also have much more variance in MTT.

So for approx the same amount of time and $ won, SnG's offer better % ITM and lower variance.

Any flaws with my analysis?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2004, 08:53 PM
AA suited AA suited is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

Another difference between SnG and MTT:
When ITM, you dont have to gamble for 1st in MTT. Unlike SnG's top heavy payout, it's linear in MTT. No need to take more risks than normal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2004, 09:37 PM
Cry Me A River Cry Me A River is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 121
Default Re: My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

[ QUOTE ]

Any flaws with my analysis?


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes:

[ QUOTE ]

MTT: For $33, you can win $270 for a profit of $237.
SNG: u can spend $66 and win $300, for a profit of $234.


[/ QUOTE ]

In SNGs, you need to risk twice the investment for about the same return. (The ROI for winning an MTT as outlined in our post is twice the ROI for winning the equivalent in SNGs)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2004, 10:33 PM
AA suited AA suited is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Any flaws with my analysis?


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes:

[ QUOTE ]

MTT: For $33, you can win $270 for a profit of $237.
SNG: u can spend $66 and win $300, for a profit of $234.


[/ QUOTE ]

In SNGs, you need to risk twice the investment for about the same return. (The ROI for winning an MTT as outlined in our post is twice the ROI for winning the equivalent in SNGs)

[/ QUOTE ]

hm..718% for MTT vs 355% SnG.

ok..let's use more specific tourny durations. SnG are more like 50 min. 100min for 2 SnGs vs 120min with MTT.

thus MTT are 1.2x longer than 2 SnGs

718% / 1.2 = ~600%

1) now does the higher variance in MTT make up for the $82.50 (250% difference in ROI on $33)???

2) Also, remember that top 30% in SnG are ITM vs 16.67% of MTT. How does that factor into this????
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2004, 01:17 AM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 234
Default Re: My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

[ QUOTE ]
Also, remember that top 30% in SnG are ITM vs 16.67% of MTT. How does that factor into this????

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming equal skill, you will place ITM in 3/10 SnGs and 1/6 MTTs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2004, 02:10 AM
chill888 chill888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 390
Default Re: My analysis of SnG vs MTT-> SnG wins

Both formats have 10% fee and return the rest of cash.

MTT have more players / less in the money so higher variance.

That's about it in your analysis. Rest depends on your style, quality of players, opportunity/desire for big wins, desire for less variance, slower structure in MTT, etc.

Matter of taste
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.