Harrington on Holdem and 'Resoultions'

[bconway6]

I’m about a third of the way through HoH and I am wondering why he includes the resolutions to the hands, especially in the 'Problems' section. I assume the hands in that section are made up to illustrate/test a specific point. What is the value in continuing on with what happens after that point is addressed? I can see if he is using a hand he has played in/seen it makes for a little entertainment to the anecdote, but in other cases what’s the point? For example at the end of problem hand 4-1. The whole point of the hand is to show that there are times when the pot dictates a call with virtually any two cards, yet he throws in that the player actually folds. Why? Who cares?