Is your mind corrupted?

[Zoltri]

TAKE A LOOK AT THE PICTURE BELOW. WHAT DO YOU SEE ?



Research has shown that young children cannot identify the intimate couple because they do not have prior memory associated with such a scenario.

What they will see are the nine dolphins.

Additional note: This is a test to determine if you already have a corrupted mind. If it's hard for you to find the dolphins within 6 seconds, your mind is indeed corrupted.

Ok.... look at her crotch..... the V is the tail of one, start at the V and follow it down along her left leg. look at the space between her right arm and her head, the tail is on her neck, follow it up. look at her left hip, follow the shaded part down, it's another one, and on his shoulder..... see them now?

[lucas9000]

i'm kind of shocked at how long it took me to recognize the dolphins after reading what you said about kids seeing dolphins. who knows how long it would have taken me to recognize them if you hadn't mentioned it at all.

[Shajen]

I don't think it's corruption, I think it's children are typically unaware of sexual acts/images.

Adults (usually) are. It isn't a "you're depraved, you effing pervert!"

It's more along the lines of: "Nice cans".

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[TimM]

[ QUOTE ]
i'm kind of shocked at how long it took me to recognize the dolphins after reading what you said about kids seeing dolphins. who knows how long it would have taken me to recognize them if you hadn't mentioned it at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

[pshreck]

I don't buy this at all. Surely children can atleast recognize a figure of a woman. Even the youngest children understand what breasts are and a body looks like. They might be confused at what exactly is going on, but I'm sure they see the body.

[A_C_Slater]

That's not the point. The point is that they notice the dolphins first. And we do not.

[pshreck]

[ QUOTE ]
That's not the point. The point is that they notice the dolphins first. And we do not.

[/ QUOTE ]

I saw the dolphins in under 6 seconds though, but I don't find that as 'scientific proof' that my mind isn't 'corrupted', which means literally nothing scientificially anyways.

I'm really calling BS on this one and saying children would see the naked woman, unless I can be linked to something that proves otherwise.

[wacki]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i'm kind of shocked at how long it took me to recognize the dolphins after reading what you said about kids seeing dolphins. who knows how long it would have taken me to recognize them if you hadn't mentioned it at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm really calling BS on this one and saying children would see the naked woman, unless I can be linked to something that proves otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay. Go find us some children then. We need you to prove to us that it's BS. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Btw, you saw the dolphins THAT fast?!
I had to strain to see them.

[A_C_Slater]

I disagree with the term "corrupted." I do not view this as a topic of "morality" as the initial poster does. To me it represents an interesting facet of awareness and how human beings interpret images in a way that is most convenient to them.