|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
I've been playing 5/10 at party for less than a month now, single-tabling. It appears that I'm running quite lucky. But I'm curious how much of it has to do with the fact that I'm playing one table at a time exclusively.
How many bb per 100 hands do you think a good or even excellent player (not me, of course) can achieve at party 5/10, playing only one table at a time? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
5
Playing one table is pretty dumb, man. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
I just moved up to 5/10, so I don't think it's dumb for me.
But I'm surprised at your answer. Over an insignificant sample - under 5,000 hands - my rate is something like 4.5, which I assumed was unsustainable, even while playing one table. If that rate is sustainable, though, I might really consider sticking to one table, which I actually enjoy more anyone. Besides, I suspect I'm one of those people whose win rate drops dramaticaly while multi-tabling. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
If you feel that your game would drop enough that it would not be +EV, there is nothing wrong with sticking to one table.
I love to 6 table the full ring games, but if I get over 3 tables short handed my decisions start to fall off. My advice to you, do what you know! And the 4.5 is sustainable with the right table selection. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
Over an insignificant sample - under 5,000 hands - my rate is something like 4.5, which I assumed was unsustainable, even while playing one table. [/ QUOTE ] I'd guess that BB/100>4.5 is possible 1-tabling 5/10 6-max. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
Things sure do change fast. Almost immediately after I started this thread, I went on a spiral downward. Still single-tabling 90% of the time, I am now losing at 5/10.
I prefer to believe that my initial good run was unsustainable by anyone. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
How many bb per 100 hands do you think a good or even excellent player (not me, of course) can achieve at party 5/10, playing only one table at a time? [/ QUOTE ] upper theoretical limit is actually 8.442 BB / 100 in practice the limit is about 6.2 BB / 100 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How many bb per 100 hands do you think a good or even excellent player (not me, of course) can achieve at party 5/10, playing only one table at a time? [/ QUOTE ] upper theoretical limit is actually 8.442 BB / 100 in practice the limit is about 6.2 BB / 100 [/ QUOTE ] Where did you get these numbers and how? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] How many bb per 100 hands do you think a good or even excellent player (not me, of course) can achieve at party 5/10, playing only one table at a time? [/ QUOTE ] upper theoretical limit is actually 8.442 BB / 100 in practice the limit is about 6.2 BB / 100 [/ QUOTE ] Where did you get these numbers and how? [/ QUOTE ] You are wrong, it is 8.443bb/100 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: best win rate while single-tabling 5/10
[ QUOTE ] You are wrong, it is 8.443bb/100 [/ QUOTE ] Sorry. The OP has a 5k sample size, so I only quoted it to 3 significant digits. |
|
|