Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:06 PM
arod15 arod15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jessica Alba How U DOING
Posts: 783
Default Rake vs Time?

Which costs the player more money in a 1-2NL or 2-5NL game. Getting raked or Time charge?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:27 PM
mikeyp mikeyp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North of Philly
Posts: 124
Default Re: Rake vs Time?

Probably rake since the limit is so low.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:47 PM
arod15 arod15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jessica Alba How U DOING
Posts: 783
Default Re: Rake vs Time?

You think players pay more than 8 dollars an hhour at the 1-2 level in rake?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:25 PM
Maulik Maulik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 30 + rake
Posts: 892
Default Re: Rake vs Time?

rake will only be $8/.5hr when you're playing with my man Jose from Borgata at 8p.

I'll pay the rake all day long
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:39 PM
other1 other1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 217
Default Re: Rake vs Time?

At low limits rake is better at high limits time is better which is exactly why it is done that way at every casino. Arguably the best is a timde game where someone runs a time pot, but I can't be bothered.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.