|
|
|
|
#1
11-07-2005, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Party Super Musings
If you played the Party "Super" Weekday tournaments 4 times a week, 50 weeks out of the year, you'd need to win one (or an equivalent amount in smaller cashes) just to break even.
Discuss. 
|
|
#2
11-07-2005, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
This is why its so important to keep accurate records of your tournament play IMO.
A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. This is also why ITM% is not as useless a stat as some would like you to believe.
|
|
#3
11-07-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around.
|
|
#4
11-07-2005, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Anybody up for some TD lowball?
|
|
#5
11-07-2005, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true.
|
|
#6
11-07-2005, 09:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe my wording wasnt clear, but this is exactly what I meant.
|
|
#7
11-07-2005, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
Winning 1 out of 200 supers to me is awful. I've played in a very small sample size of about 30 of them but have already cashed 7 times. I can't imagine playing 199 supers without even getting cracked just inside the bubble. And 200 supers, does anyone realize how many that is? If I played 200 supers I would hope for 5-6 final tables at least. Can't wait till I get ripped on for this one.
-Ace
|
|
#8
11-07-2005, 09:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe my wording wasnt clear, but this is exactly what I meant. [/ QUOTE ] Your wording was clear. I was just agreeing with you.
|
|
#9
11-07-2005, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] I was speaking of LHE players, as that is what the majority of cash game players are. Obviously a good NL cash game player should be able to employ many of the same tactics in a NL tournament.
|
|
#10
11-07-2005, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] I was speaking of LHE players, as that is what the majority of cash game players are. Obviously a good NL cash game player should be able to employ many of the same tactics in a NL tournament. [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't sound correct to me. I thought NL was more popular these days. What data are you basing your statement on?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
