#1
|
|||
|
|||
Number of tables to play?
I am trying to determine the optimal # of tables one can play without impacting their game that much.
1-2 for me is cake for me, its like playing 1. 3-4 is easy since I play only 18% of my hands. I can still watch players and take good notes on all of them. My double monitor allows me to keep all hand histories up to view at an instant. 5-6 I can do but I miss a lot of player info. Takes me a while to get an accurate read on players. I also notice I sometimes mix tables, basically call somewhere I should not. Costs me money. So what about you people? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Number of tables to play?
I only have one small monitor so 2 is optimal for me. I have been four-tabling a lot lately which gets hectic because of the overlap of the tables. I need a new monitor...or two! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Number of tables to play?
You and me both brother. I tried upping the resolution but I sit too far away from the monitor to be able to see it. I need a nice big LCD monitor.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Number of tables to play?
I play 2. When I start going on tilt, I play 3. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]I have a rare form of tilt.
Brad |
|
|