Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2004, 11:24 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

Super loose-passive 1/2 table at Pacific. The table is just disgustingly bad, but I'm not getting cards.

6 limpers to me in the SB, and I raise with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. BB folds, everyone else calls.

7 to the flop for 15SB.

Flop comes J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].

I bet, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 2 other callers, 2 people fold.

5 to the turn for 10BB.

Turn comes 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

I bet, 2 callers, two folds.

River comes 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

I bet, UTG calls, UTG+1 raises, I . . .

Comments on the rest of the hand?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2004, 11:31 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

I will bet you $20 that he has a 3. Fold. Remember that he is raising you and a caller.

Shill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2004, 11:32 PM
toss toss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 2+2 Archives Digging up Gold
Posts: 1,327
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

If the table is really passive, then I don't see why UTG would raise the river without the 3s. I'd have to say your behind here so I would just call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:07 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

Fold.

Tell me your'e kidding or drunk.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:10 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

Calling is standard. But if you have seen the rasier do this with as litle as a naked J, then I'd reraise. A lot of times when the board pairs on the end, really bad players perk up, thinking, "Hey Iv'e got 2 pair!" But they have to be really bad for this move, so raise jusdiciously.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:25 AM
radek2166 radek2166 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 859
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

[ QUOTE ]
really bad players perk up, thinking, "Hey Iv'e got 2 pair!" But they have to be really bad for this move,

[/ QUOTE ]

THats the line of the day.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:28 AM
nothumb nothumb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 90
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

It's true. I just watched someone do it on a table at Paradise. They forget that you still have a kicker with two pair.

I think you call on the river. But you un-check the 'muck losing hands' option, and you make him wait the maximum ammount of time before you muck to his 43o.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2004, 12:30 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

[ QUOTE ]

I think you call on the river. But you un-check the 'muck losing hands' option, and you make him wait the maximum ammount of time before you muck to his 43o.

NT

[/ QUOTE ]
Close. It was actually 32o.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:24 AM
Reqtech Reqtech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Swingin on the .5/1 money tree.
Posts: 109
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

Considering that you're first to act on the flop, I'd go for a check raise since you aren't going to protect your hand with such a big pot, nearly any hand has the odds to call one bet.

-edit- hmm, for 15 bets, nearly any hand will have the odds to call for 2 bets. so I think that you did fine by building the pot -edit-

Though, you did say the table was very passive, so maybe the bet wouldn't come through and your bet out front to build the pot came through.

I'm sure that UTG+1 has the 3, but for 16BB you have to call.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-29-2004, 04:36 PM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 83
Default Re: Tough hand, loose-passive table (QJs, SB)

Fold, protected pot, loose passive goofballs. You know what he has. Calling is just throwing $2 away, your better than that.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.