#1
|
|||
|
|||
No bet/call-check/raise-bet line?
Just curious why this wasn't included in Shillx's lines that he uses. (from this post)
It's easy to read, but time and time again I see tags pay ir off with top pair or worse. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No bet/call-check/raise-bet line?
I think that's #6 on Shillx's list.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No bet/call-check/raise-bet line?
[ QUOTE ]
I think that's #6 on Shillx's list. [/ QUOTE ] I'm officially a douche-bag, if this is correct. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No bet/call-check/raise-bet line?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think that's #6 on Shillx's list. [/ QUOTE ] I'm officially a douche-bag, if this is correct. [/ QUOTE ] #6 is check/call, check/raise, bet. But this doesn't officially make me a non-douche-bag. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Basically, I like to use this on ace-high flops when I make my set (usually middle, like TT or 99), vs a PFRR from a TAA, when I'm OOP. Edit: I mean I like bet/calling instead of check-calling. It seems to get an extra small bet, when the guy has AK... this may not be enough to justify the risk of slowing him down with a flop bet, though. |
|
|