![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two pair guy has [3d, 6d, 6c, Qh, 7d, Qc] Two pairs QQ66
I have [ Kd, Kc, 3c, 4c, Jc, 5c] a flush, king high. Pot is $36, it had been multi-way till now but on 6th street is heads up. Did he have proper odds to call here w/ all live cards? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what limit? I think he needs 10-1 here.
- Mac |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What limit is it?
Assuming 1/2 he's getting 19:1 to try and catch one of 4 outs. Lets also assume he knows what you have in the hole, because heck you're a nice guy and told him. So his odds of catching are 36:4 or 9:1 against. Boy yeah is he right to call (realize that this doesn't take into account all the other cards he's seen since this was a multiway pot). Even at 2/4 he's right to chase. 3/6 or higher it would depend on how many other cards were seen or not. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was $2/4. I guess he just had 10-1.
$4 to win $40, but doubt all his cards were live. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He is correct to chase here, not only because he has the odds, but also because most players would bet an open four flush, whether they have another club or not. Unless I had a strong reason to think you could beat queens up, I would also call the river unimproved if I were him.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He is also getting great implied odds and is in a position to check raise on the river to get two bets out of you if he hits.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am very much in the habit of calling down open four-flushes with two pair. Was there some reason that he should have known that you had to have the flush? Most folks will bet an open four-flush whatever they have underneath.
BTW, there's a whole forum devoted to bad beat posts. |
![]() |
|
|