Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2005, 10:49 PM
Yeti Yeti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 30
Default I should have checked behind.

Following the recent discussion about checking flush draws behind on the flop, here's one where I should have gone with my gut and used my newly discovered trick.

10/20, full table. Folded to me in CO w/ AhKh.

I make it $75, SB calls, BB calls. We all have 3k.

KQJhh
chk chk 200, fold, BB makes it 400 more, I call.

4o
1400, fold.

Meh.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2005, 10:59 PM
MoDOH MoDOH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

Since you didnīt check on the flop how about moving all-in? You have 12 clean outs and could have as many as 15...
You have 12 outs against a set
You have 15 outs agaisnt two pair
You have 9 nutouts + 2 split outs against a nutstraight
You have 11 nutouts against a low straight

Depending on your opponent I think itīs really close...

But since your folding equity is pretty much zero I think itīs better to play it the way you did...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:00 PM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

Yeah I think you have that one pretty figured out. . flop check gets you paid off more by a lower flush than a flop bet while also keeping the pot small with a showdownable hand. And a flop bet getting raised makes your TPTK insignificant.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:03 PM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

With $2K stacks I like the all in a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:11 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

IMO, you have two choices good choices when it is your turn on the flop...
you can bet 200, hoping to get raised and push, or you can check it. the way you played it (as you realize)sucks...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:31 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 71
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

With the stacks that deep I like the check behind on the flop. You have a hand that might be ahead, villian has to play as catious as you, and you can call a pot sized bet on the turn. Plus for me, I get check raised so often by such marginal holdings, I would almost be forced to push the flop. I'm all for pushing sraight flush draws, but this is a tough one. You can make him fold a lot of hands that are better than yours, if you're not ahead already, but I just don't know if it's worth $2700 to win $1025 against this board.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2005, 12:24 AM
IHateCats IHateCats is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

Yep, definitely a check on the flop here, 3 cards over 9 should usually be a check in position with this many players when you have TPTK but a lot of outs, the odds of someone else having a powerhouse are just too good to start building a big pot with top pair there.

Definitely a fold on the turn even if all your outs are good here since if you flat call and hit, all your outs are so incredibly obvious he might get away from it so even the max implied odds of what's left of his stack don't justify a call against even the weakest of his possible holdings here. Yuck.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2005, 01:07 AM
aggie aggie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

Pushing after the checkraise in my opinion is bad. He'll only get called by better hands and no better hand is folding. He would be better off calling the 400 raise, and then calling the 1400 on the turn. But given the bet, i like the way he played the flop.

That said, i love checking this flop, especailly against aggressive opponents
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2005, 01:10 AM
aggie aggie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

[ QUOTE ]
You can make him fold a lot of hands that are better than yours, if you're not ahead already,

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is true, than i love pushing the flop. i just don't see villian folding many better hands here.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2005, 02:22 AM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 71
Default Re: I should have checked behind.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You can make him fold a lot of hands that are better than yours, if you're not ahead already,

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is true, than i love pushing the flop. i just don't see villian folding many better hands here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Two pair is a virtual coin flip, so although those hands aren't any better, they are taking away EV, so I'd still like them fold.

If I was the villian in this hand I would have a very hard time calling $2400 with JJ or KQ and AA, KJ, and QJ are in the muck for sure.

I still don't think villian folds enough to make the push +EV with stacks this deep.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.