#1
|
|||
|
|||
Obvious Set Right
Hero has T9s on button.
6-handed $600 NL 5 limpers see flop. Flop: T,9,5 rainbow. Checked to hero, hero bets pot, one limper calls. Turn: 2 Hero bets 80% of pot, villian raises all-in, hero folds. I have note on villian saying he's passive. I think he had set, anyone disagree. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
stack sizes?
a set, lower 2 pair or a terribly played overpair are all possible (limp -> back AA/KK with entire stack is sadly somewhat common on party). BTW - did the turn complete the rainbow or add a flush draw? If it added a flush draw then I'd be more likely to put him on a set. Would make sense for a passive player to play like this with a set until an "obvious" draw shows up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
Full stacks.
Don't remember suit of duece |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
i usually pay off top2 there with villain's range being much wide than 55
5 limpers in 3/6 6max?? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
Tough laydown, very opponent-dependent. Against a normally passive Villain it's probably a fold, though. But I think it's close.
Kirk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
I always pay him off with top two ... and they always have a set .... maybe I should stop.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
i would also pay this one off
a lot of party players make weird allin moves on the turn. this sure looks like a weird line for a set. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
strange way to play a set. i think i call here and expect him to show me jacks and fidgetness.
if the 2 was a flush draw now youre not assuming OES+FD because hes passive correct? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Set Right
The number of limpers also effected my decision, much more likely one could have a PP.
I just can't see a situation where opponent would do it with a hand I beat, given his track record. Only other possibility is the same hand as me. |
|
|