|
|
#2
07-05-2005, 09:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 3/6 full is dead
Small sample size. Tight games are beatable as well and with less variance.
|
|
#3
07-05-2005, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 3/6 full is dead
[ QUOTE ]
Small sample size. Tight games are beatable as well and with less variance. [/ QUOTE ] I never cease to amaze myself by leaving a weak-tight game in which I am making gradual progress only to get on a laggy rollercoaster on another table. It is important to remember our early S&M teachings about how a beatable game consists of only two or more players playing incorrectly- incorrectly meaning differently than they advise but perhaps in line with the way other authors advise. The last time I played in a casino was at the Mirage between Christmas and New Years. The $10 $20 games were not at all wild but rather of the weaker tight-aggressive variety. You might not drag in the monster pots that you would in a hardcore donkfest but you also wouldn't endure the beats you would in said laggy games. It is good for our overall skills to play in games where we need to pay closer attention to our kickers, hand reading, blind stealing and defense and folding to a raise every now and then- as oppossed to playing any two suited. Not that variance can't happen in tighter games, too.
|
|
#6
07-05-2005, 10:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 3/6 full is dead
[ QUOTE ]
This is actually inspiring me to play the games right now. [/ QUOTE ] Go get 'em, tiger. Grind those rocks into dust!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
