Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2005, 02:02 AM
lehighguy lehighguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 590
Default Very Common Hand, but important

$600NL 6-handed. Loose and Aggressive but not maniac.

Hero is on button with AQs.

One limper, Hero raises to $30, folded to limper who calls.

Flop: 5, 2, 5 rainbow.

Check to Hero, Hero bets $50, limper check raises to $200 (he is short stacked and now all-in). Additional $150 to call.

Hero ???

Read is that he could be bluffing with high cards, bluffing with another ace, or have a PP.

I called. Figured I had a decent chance of being ahead or tied. Plus it's a pretty small group of regs at this site and there may be some future +EV from letting them know not to play back at me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2005, 03:01 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

I would only call his reraise if i had a tell on him. How could you call a reraise with AQhigh? if he has PP you are 1/4 againts,he could have 22, 55(very unlikely) and then you are drawing dead. what cards did he have?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2005, 03:14 AM
Yeknom58 Yeknom58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 552
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

"Read is that he could be bluffing with high cards, bluffing with another ace, or have a PP."

Seems like any easy call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:51 AM
lehighguy lehighguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 590
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

He had 66, but to be honest I figured there was a good chance he didn't have a PP. Say 50%. And if he didn't have a PP I figured my AQ was ahead.

The site I play on is pretty loose. When you play 6-handed, there's alot more bluffing. People often use short stacks as an advantage because they can make one big bluff and not have to continue if thier trapped.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:52 AM
lehighguy lehighguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 590
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

How does it change if villian has full stack?

It seems it would be profitable for him to checkraise me all the time if I always fold.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2005, 12:16 PM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

Hi lehigh guy,

[ QUOTE ]
How does it change if villian has full stack?

It seems it would be profitable for him to checkraise me all the time if I always fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right, as long as he knows to do this only when you have AQ, rather than a PP.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2005, 12:16 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Very Common Hand, but important

Playing hands the way you did this one is the reason that most people lose money with AK. You had AQ, but its the same thing.

I did a survey once and got alot of people to give me their AK stats and the majority were losing or around break even.

The guy is not going to check raise all in with just overcards unless he an idiot.

Fold to his check raise and move on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.