Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2004, 04:52 AM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Frontloading - An Ethics Question

I found myself in an interesting situation last night at a local cardroom. I was sitting in seat 1 with my chin resting on my pyramid of chips. As the dealer would come around to the blinds, he would lift up his arms to pitch over the chips, making it easy for me to see the cards being dealt to the players in the blinds. At that point, I had never considered the ethical implications of "front loading" in poker. (I am 100% okay with it in blackjack.)

I lifted my head off my chips and didn't put myself in a position to frontload the rest of that dealer's time, because I was a bit uncomfortable. Since then, I have put much thought into the ethical implications surrounding the issue. I vaguely remembered Mason Malmuth writing something about it, and I found an essay in Poker Essays I titled "Front Loading, Anyone?" briefly addressing the issue. In it, he states (and I hope Mason doesn't mind me quoting this):
A point I want to make is that front loading definately is not cheating. Although I feel it is somewhat unethical, this information is available to all players at the table. Consequently, players who are able to front load are not doing anything wrong; it is the cardroom's responsibility to make sure its dealers follow proper procedure.

As I thought more about the situation, a few points came to mind:
1) There are times when a player seated next to me is showing me their hole cards, and I often don't have any conflict in continuing to view their cards. How many times I tell the player they are exposing their hole cards depends on the type of player (0 if they are a knowledgable, regular player - 1 or 2 times if they are a newbie - every time if they are elderly with poor eyesight and must hold up their cards to see them). In what ways is front loading the same or different from this?
2) It is a player's responsibility to protect their hand. If someone is able to see my hole cards because of how the dealer is pitching them to me, but yet I continue to allow the dealer to do so, it is heavily my fault people can see my cards. I would not feel cheated if someone front loaded me - I would feel dumb for letting it happen.
3) It feels unethical. My gut reaction (which I try to trust in ethical dilemmas) was that it just smelled foul. And this has been true for most poker players I have asked about front loading.

There are many other points to consider, and I hope they come out in discussion.

This is significant, because I believe that knowing just 1 or 2 hole cards per hand could easily add 1/2+ BBs to your hourly rate. There is no doubt this information is significantly valuable.

So I guess my real question is what are your guys' thought on the ethics of front loading at the poker table?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2004, 12:42 PM
FoxRiverPlayer FoxRiverPlayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 8
Default Re: Frontloading - An Ethics Question

I agree with most of what you said, but I feel that players should never be punished for a dealer's sloppiness. The dealer could be exposing a player's cards in a way such that the player would never see it from their angle. So this is something I would speak up about (anyway it could happen to me too next time I'm in that seat with that dealer).

Similarly, I always hate dealer sloppiness to affect the showdown. For instance, hands where one party has the high hand but apparently thinks they have lost, yet turns their cards up anyway in a sort of "I lost but I'll show anyway" motion. The dealer should look at both hands, and declare the winner. But sometimes you get bad dealers who can't seem to tell which is the high hand, and start to push the pot to the loser. Then the player who thinks he has lost starts to really muck his hand--that's when I'm stepping in. He has the winning hand and showed it, it shouldn't matter if neither he nor the dealer realizes it as the winner. Of course if he actually mucked the winner before it was seen, that's his own problem. And other players shouldn't be talking about what hands might win, etc. before the showdown. But nobody should lose a hand because of the dealer not doing his/her job.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:24 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default I think that Mason is wrong about this...

[ QUOTE ]
I vaguely remembered Mason Malmuth writing something about it, and I found an essay in Poker Essays I titled "Front Loading, Anyone?" briefly addressing the issue. In it, he states (and I hope Mason doesn't mind me quoting this):
A point I want to make is that front loading definately is not cheating. Although I feel it is somewhat unethical, this information is available to all players at the table. Consequently, players who are able to front load are not doing anything wrong; it is the cardroom's responsibility to make sure its dealers follow proper procedure.


[/ QUOTE ]

Mason is wrong about this, since a player may not be in position to see the frontloading, which means he will neither be able to take advantage of it nor see that others can possibly see his cards.

Furthermore, say a player sees the improper dealing, politely asks the dealer to keep the deck pointed down, yet continues to see frontloading occur. Other than to call over the floor (which may or may not accomplish anything), how is a player supposed to protect himself, especially when authorities like Mason think there is nothing wrong with this type of angleshooting?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:48 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: I think that Mason is wrong about this...

Hi chesspain:

One of the reasons we published The Professional Poker Dealer's Handbook was to try to correct problems like this. Incompetent poker dealing has been an industry wide problem for as long as I can remember.

Fortunately, the book has had an impact (we think) and since it came out the quality of dealers has been improving even though it still has a way to go. However, the trend has been reversed this past year with the addition of so many new dealers reflecting the growth in poker.

Part of the solution in these cases is to talk to the poker room manager and explain the problem to them. If you're lucky they will address it.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2004, 03:31 PM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Re: Frontloading - An Ethics Question

[ QUOTE ]
...I feel that players should never be punished for a dealer's sloppiness.

[/ QUOTE ]
How 'bout for other players' sloppiness? Last week I was sitting across from a player who would pick up his cards to muck them, and often expose his bottom hole card to the players across from him. When I changed seats later in the session, I could no longer see his exposed card, and so I discretely pointed out to him that players might be abe to see his cards, and he stopped doing this. Is this situation any different?

Isn't it always a player's responsibility to make sure that his hand and other players' hands are protected?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2004, 03:37 PM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Re: I think that Mason is wrong about this...

[ QUOTE ]
Mason is wrong about this, since a player may not be in position to see the frontloading, which means he will neither be able to take advantage of it nor see that others can possibly see his cards.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you're playing a 5-handed game with Sklansky, Clarkmeister, Malmuth, and Ray Zee, do you feel the same way? Are these players not experienced enought that should be 100% accountable for protecting their hand in all ways possible?

That sitiuation feels a lot different to me than the situation I was in the other night.

What game conditions (if any) change things for you?

Mason, do you see these situations as different?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2004, 04:30 PM
ZeeJustin ZeeJustin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern VA (near DC)
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: I think that Mason is wrong about this...

[ QUOTE ]
If you're playing a 5-handed game with Sklansky, Clarkmeister, Malmuth, and Ray Zee, do you feel the same way?

[/ QUOTE ]

He already stated that when playing against the elderly, he will inform them that he can see their cards.

Just kidding! Please don't ban me [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2004, 04:44 PM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Re: I think that Mason is wrong about this...

lol
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-04-2004, 02:30 AM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Re: Frontloading - An Ethics Question

What, no other takers? Clarmeister, Dynasty, the Vegas Crew, El Diablo, Andyfox, J.A., GoT, nobody? Thoughts on when - if ever - front loading is okay?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-04-2004, 01:14 PM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: I think that Mason is wrong about this...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mason is wrong about this, since a player may not be in position to see the frontloading, which means he will neither be able to take advantage of it nor see that others can possibly see his cards.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you're playing a 5-handed game with Sklansky, Clarkmeister, Malmuth, and Ray Zee, do you feel the same way? Are these players not experienced enought that should be 100% accountable for protecting their hand in all ways possible?



[/ QUOTE ]

If others aren't in a position to see the frontloading, then they can't take advantage of it or try to prevent it, regardless of how well they play poker. Or are you asking if angleshooting is O.K. when you are a huge underdog in a game?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.