Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2005, 03:24 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default General 6max observations for comment

Ok, so I've been at this 6max thing for a few days, now. Started out at .5/1, but that seems like kind of a waste of time. They players there are so weak-tight that if you win a hand you can push them off anything from there on out, or so clueless that they'll call down with king-high no matter the board. The players at 1/2 seem a little more aware, so I've moved up there to work on it.

Here are some of my observations; correct me if I'm wrong:

* You want to expand your range of hands a little, but not a lot. Suited kings, for instance, play, along with suited one-gaps in "early" position.

* Your pfr should be significantly higher (maybe 50%, so instead of 10-14 you're looking at 15-20) than what you play at full ring.

* When we talk about using 6max to "learn aggression" it's POSTflop, not pre. So, once you (a) flop a hand, or (b) have position in a hand where nobody seems to love their cards you need to hit it hard and try to win the hand.

Are these generalizations accurate as far as they go? Anything anybody want to add?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2005, 03:35 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 911
Default Re: General 6max observations for comment

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, so I've been at this 6max thing for a few days, now. Started out at .5/1, but that seems like kind of a waste of time. They players there are so weak-tight that if you win a hand you can push them off anything from there on out, or so clueless that they'll call down with king-high no matter the board. The players at 1/2 seem a little more aware, so I've moved up there to work on it.

Here are some of my observations; correct me if I'm wrong:

* You want to expand your range of hands a little, but not a lot. Suited kings, for instance, play, along with suited one-gaps in "early" position.

* Your pfr should be significantly higher (maybe 50%, so instead of 10-14 you're looking at 15-20) than what you play at full ring.

* When we talk about using 6max to "learn aggression" it's POSTflop, not pre. So, once you (a) flop a hand, or (b) have position in a hand where nobody seems to love their cards you need to hit it hard and try to win the hand.

Are these generalizations accurate as far as they go? Anything anybody want to add?

[/ QUOTE ]

its the same game as full ring .. just UTG-MP1 always fold

a large part of your PFR is the same as it was at full ring, isolation and stealraises from the CO and BTN

really its not that different of a game, blind play is different since you are in defending situations much more often, though at 1/2 you aren't being raised too much

my UTG standards(6handed)

77+(sometimes 66, sometimes 88+), A8s+, ATo+(sometimes AJo+), KJs+, KJo+(I don't always raise KJo), QJs, and sometimes JTs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:02 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: General 6max observations for comment

So it's more of a matter of dealing with others' aggression at the 6max game?

[ QUOTE ]
my UTG standards(6handed)

77+(sometimes 66, sometimes 88+), A8s+, ATo+(sometimes AJo+), KJs+, KJo+(I don't always raise KJo), QJs, and sometimes JTs

[/ QUOTE ]

These are caling standards?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:03 PM
tiltaholic tiltaholic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: General 6max observations for comment

[ QUOTE ]
So it's more of a matter of dealing with others' aggression at the 6max game?

[ QUOTE ]
my UTG standards(6handed)

77+(sometimes 66, sometimes 88+), A8s+, ATo+(sometimes AJo+), KJs+, KJo+(I don't always raise KJo), QJs, and sometimes JTs

[/ QUOTE ]

These are caling standards?

[/ QUOTE ]

do you ever limp first in from mp2?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:08 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: General 6max observations for comment

[ QUOTE ]
do you ever limp first in from mp2?

[/ QUOTE ]

Depends. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Ok, fine, not much.

I've also not played much short-handed, and so I'm trying to get some expert advice.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:19 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Q7s hand

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>...

So, as an example. PFR is to steal, probably a play I'd make in a full ring game, too. The turn follow-up bet with bottom pair, no redraw, would also be made. The difference is in a full ring game I'd be prepared to call a c/r, and fold the turn to aggression, I'm not sure I'd do that in 6max. Is all this right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:31 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 911
Default Re: Q7s hand

[ QUOTE ]
Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>...

So, as an example. PFR is to steal, probably a play I'd make in a full ring game, too. The turn follow-up bet with bottom pair, no redraw, would also be made. The difference is in a full ring game I'd be prepared to call a c/r, and fold the turn to aggression, I'm not sure I'd do that in 6max. Is all this right?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't steal in the CO with Q7s, BTN yes but you have to be alittle careful with stealing from the CO with marginal hands

and my standards were open-raising standards, I very rarely openlimp at 6max
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:37 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: Q7s hand

Good stuff. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:49 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: General 6max observations for comment

I'm trying out a little experiment inspired by Joe Tall. He'll limp 22 UTG at fairly loose-passive (read, most micro and SS) tables, but still open-fold 22-44 in MP. It feels dirty every time I do it, but I need more hands to make a judgment. I don't have much evidence yet as to whether or not it's profitable.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.