Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2005, 06:45 PM
J-Lo J-Lo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Default trips vs 2+2er

i think leading out would be the good play, but i wanted to keep the pot small, and when luckbox bet, i knew he had a Q-- i want the pot small...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2005, 06:48 PM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 234
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
i think leading out would be the good play, but i wanted to keep the pot small, and when luckbox bet, i knew he had a Q-- i want the pot small...

[/ QUOTE ]

What?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2005, 07:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
What?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2005, 07:19 PM
Karak567 Karak567 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

With all the details you provided on this hand it is very easy to give you an answer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2005, 07:20 PM
codewarrior codewarrior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mentor, OH, USA
Posts: 79
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

You're thinking the fast play to disguise that your hand really is a monster here, right? If that's your drift, then yes. Make it look like a probe bet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2005, 07:33 PM
iMsoLucky0 iMsoLucky0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 516
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
i think leading out would be the good play, but i wanted to keep the pot small, and when luckbox bet, i knew he had a Q-- i want the pot small...

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree, the monkeys from the Congo almost definitely do not undersant advanced calculus.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2005, 08:10 PM
J-Lo J-Lo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

ha ha ha

***** Hand History for Game 2630719085 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:15334662 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Wednesday, August 31, 18:41:49 EDT 2005
Table Table 11547 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: urgggh ( $1000 )
Seat 2: fungo65 ( $305 )
Seat 3: Carlos62 ( $740 )
Seat 4: spence226 ( $1000 )
Seat 5: DPten ( $1510 )
Seat 7: SugLaPicc ( $1545 )
Seat 8: westsideG ( $915 )
Seat 9: nirzharsux ( $1985 )
Seat 10: Luckbox21 ( $1000 )
Trny:15334662 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to nirzharsux [ Qd 9c ]
urgggh folds.
fungo65 folds.
Carlos62 folds.
spence226 calls [15].
DPten folds.
SugLaPicc folds.
westsideG folds.
nirzharsux calls [5].
>You have options at Table 11839 Table!.
Luckbox21 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ Jc, Qs, Qc ]
Your time bank will become active in less than 20 seconds. If you do not want it to be used, please act now.
nirzharsux checks.
>You have options at Table 11578 Table!.
Luckbox21 bets [45].
spence226 folds.
nirzharsux calls [45].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 9h ]
nirzharsux checks.
>You have options at Table 11578 Table!.
Luckbox21 bets [75].
nirzharsux raises [150].
Luckbox21 is all-In [865]
nirzharsux calls [790].
** Dealing River ** [ 7c ]
nirzharsux shows [ Qd, 9c ] a full house, Queens full of nines.
Luckbox21 shows [ Qh, 7h ] a full house, Queens full of sevens.
nirzharsux wins 2015 chips from the main pot with a full house, Queens full of nines.
Luckbox21 finished in ninth place.
Luckbox21 has left the table.


i forgot to post the hand... here it is.... anyone like me keepin the pot small (til a hit the monster card) vs a 2+2er? with a very questionable kicker?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2005, 08:21 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

Never go broke in an unraised pot.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2005, 09:43 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

When playing against someone else who 'knows' your style of play, yes you should definately disguise your strategy. One way to do that is to NOT smooth call, but raise-call. Another important factor to keep in mind is that in general, I think it's wise to play trips (don't read a set) pretty fast. It's just too easy to end up with the 2nd best hand without knowing it because of too slow of play.

Scuba
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2005, 11:07 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: trips vs 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
When playing against someone else who 'knows' your style of play, yes you should definately disguise your strategy. One way to do that is to NOT smooth call, but raise-call. Another important factor to keep in mind is that in general, I think it's wise to play trips (don't read a set) pretty fast. It's just too easy to end up with the 2nd best hand without knowing it because of too slow of play.

Scuba

[/ QUOTE ]

Generally speaking, action dries up very fast on dangerous boards in SnGs. I like playing hands like this fast on the flop and it seems to work out pretty well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.